Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/44543/2014 of NEHA KUMARI AND ANR Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS on 31 December 2014
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-44543-2014 Date of Decision: December 31, 2014 Neha Kumari and another .....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURMIT RAM Present: Mr. Harish Nain, Advocate, for the petitioners. ***** GURMIT
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Neha Kumari and another
CRM-M-44543-2014Date of Decision: December 31, 2014
Versus
_.. Petitioners
State of Haryana and others
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURMIT RAM
Present:Mr. Harish Nain, Advocate,for the petitioners.
KKK K
GURMIT RAM, J. (Oral)
.....Respondents
Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. is forissuance of a direction to the official respondents to protect the life and liberty of thepetitioners and not to harass them at the instance of respondent Nos.6 to 10.
The petitioners have got married against the wishes of their parents. Theyare stated to be major. In support of her proof of age, petitioner No.1 has placed onrecord a copy of secondary examination certificate, 2011 (Annexure P-1) wherein herdate of birth is mentioned as 07.08.1996, whereas petitioner No.2 has also placed onrecord a copy of secondary examination certificate, 2008 (Annexure P-2) depicting hisdate of birth as 15.10.1992. They have also moved a representation before the DeputyCommissioner of Police, Gurgaon (Annexure P-5) for protection of their life andliberty.
Without adverting to the merits of the controversy, the present petition isdisposed of with a direction to respondent No.3, the the Deputy Commissioner ofPolice, Gurgaon to take appropriate action on the said representation.
This order has nothing to do with regard to validity or invalidity of themarriage of the petitioners.
| GURMIT RAM JJUDGE