Gujarat High Court
SCA/14197/1993 of JAYANTILAL G JARIWALA Vs SAKARLAL GOKULDAS RANA on 18 December 2003
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 14197 of 1993 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE H.K.RATHOD ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 14197 of 1993
For Approval and Signature:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE H.K.RATHOD
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO
to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO
of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals?
-------------------------------------------------------------- JAYANTILAL G JARIWALA
Versus
SAKARLAL GOKULDAS RANA
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
1. Special Civil Application No. 14197 of 1993 MR PC MASTER for Petitioner No. 1 MR AG VYAS for Respondent No. 1
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE H.K.RATHOD
Date of decision: 18/12/2003
ORAL JUDGEMENT
Heard learned advocate Mr. P.C.Master for petitioner and learned advocate Mr. A.G.Vyas appearing on behalf of respondent.
2. When the matter has been taken up for hearing Mr. P.C.Master submitted that inspite of repeated letters served to the petitioner no response is received by him from the petitioner and, according to his information petitioner is already died and legal heirs have not been brought on record in time and they were also not come forward with a request to join them as party in place of the petitioner who died. He, therefore, submitted that this matter can be disposed of as having become infructuous.
3. In view of the above fact, according to my opinion Mr. Master is right to submit that this petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, present petition is disposed as having become infructuous. Rule is discharged. Interim relief, if any, stands vacated.
�����(H.K.Rathod,J)
Jayanti*