Gauhati High Court
IA(C)/266/2024 of M/s J J Enterprise Vs The State of AP and 6 Ors on 23 December 2024
GAHC040018292024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(C)/266/2024 M/s J J Enterprise Age: 0 Occupation : Address:represented by its proprietor Shri Kipa Rokio Son of Kipa Tatup resident of 6 Kilo Itanagar PO and PS
GAHC040018292024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : IA(C)/266/2024
M/s J J Enterprise Age: 0 Occupation : Address:represented by its proprietor Shri Kipa Rokio Son of Kipa Tatup resident of 6 Kilo Itanagar PO and PS Itanagar Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh.
VERSUS
The State of AP and 6 Ors Age: 0Occupation : Address:represented by the Secretary RWD cum Chief Executive Officer (ARRDA) Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar. 2:The Chief Engineer (PMGSY)Age: 0 Occupation : Address:Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar. 3:The Superintendent EngineerAge: 0 Occupation : Address:Rural Work Circle (RWC) Rupa West Kameng District Arunachal Pradesh.
4:The Executive EngineerAge: 0 Occupation : Address:Bameng RWD Division Bameng East Kameng District Arunachal Pradesh. 5:The ChairmanAge: 0 Occupation : Address:The Bid Evaluation Committee RWC Rupa West Kameng District Arunachal Pradesh. 6:M/s Capital EnterprseAge: 0 Occupation : Address:represented by its proprietor Smti Senbom Taipodia wife of Shri Dayanand Thakur resident of C Sector Naharlagun PO and PS Naharlagun Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh. 7:M/s Yana EnterpriseAge: 0 Occupation : Address:represented by its proprietor Shri Lama Bagang Son of Late Kache Bagang resident of Gohpur PO RK Mission PS Itanagar Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh. ------------ Advocate for : Nending KagoAdvocate for : Gimi Tarak appearing for The State of AP and 6 Ors: Advocate , appearing for 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, respectively.
Linked Case : WP(C)/462/2024
Page 1 of 3
M/s JJ Enterprise Age: 0 Occupation : Address:represented by its proprietor Shri Kipa Rokio Son of Kipa Tatup resident of 6 Kilo Itanagar PO and PS Itanagar Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUSThe State of AP and 6 Ors Age: 0Occupation : Address:represented by the Secretary RWD cum Chief Executive Officer (ARRDA) Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar. 2:The Chief Engineer (PMGSY)Age: 0 Occupation : Address:Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar. 3:The Supdt EngineerAge: 0 Occupation : Address:Rural Work Circle (RWC) Rupa West Kameng District Arunachal Pradesh. 4:The Executive EngineerAge: 0 Occupation : Address:Bameng RWD Division Bameng East Kameng District Arunachal Pradesh. 5:The ChairmanAge: 0 Occupation : Address:The Bid Evaluation Committee RWC
Rupa West Kameng District Arunachal Pradesh. 6:M/s Capital EnterpriseAge: 0 Occupation : Address:represented by its proprietor Smti Senbom Taipodia wife of Shri Dayanand Thakur resident of C Sector Naharlagun PO and PS Naharlagun Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh. 7:M/s Yana EnterpriseAge: 0 Occupation : Address:represented by its proprietor Shri Lama Bagang Son of Late Kache Bagang resident of Gohpur PO RK Mission PS Itanagar Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh.
------------
Advocate for : Nending KagoAdvocate for : Gimi Tarak appearing for The State of AP and 6 Ors: Advocate , appearing for 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, respectively.
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Date : 24.12.2024
ORDER
Heard Mr. N. Kago, learned counsel for the applicant.
By filing this application, the applicant/writ petitioner has prayed for allowinghim to correct the typographical errors in the connected writ petition beingWP(C)/462(AP)2024 whereby the petitioner has inadvertently written M/s Capital Enterprise and M/s Yana Enterprise as respondents No. 7 & 8 instead of respondentsNo. 6 & 7.
Page 2 of 3
Having considered the submissions and on perusal of the application and alsothe prayer not being objected to by the learned standing counsel for the Rural WorksDepartment, Mr. G. Tarak, the petitioner is allowed to correct the typographical errorbeing respondents No. 7 & 8 as respondents No. 6 & 7 in the connected writ petition.
Interlocutory application stands disposed of.
Petitioner to file an amended petition and furnish a copy to the learned standingcounsel for the respondents.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Page 3 of 3
Loading citations and judicial treatment…