Gauhati High Court

IA(C)/232/2024 of M/s S S Infrazone Pvt Ltd Vs Smti Gimen Apang on 22 December 2024

GAHC040016322024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(C)/232/2024 M/s S S Infrazone Pvt Ltd Ramsing Village, PO and PS Jengging, Upper Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh. represented by its power of attorney holder

GAHC040016322024

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)

Case No. : IA(C)/232/2024

M/s S S Infrazone Pvt Ltd Ramsing Village, PO and PS Jengging, Upper Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh. represented by its power of attorney holder Shri Oni Pangkam, Son of Shri Alo Pangkam, resident of Village Ramsing, PO and PS Jengging, Upper Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh.

VERSUS

Smti Gimen Apang

Wife of Shri Taying Nokar, resident of Ramsing Village, PO and PS Jengging, Upper Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh.

Advocate for the Petitioner : Oyina Perme, Advocate for the Respondent : Adam Tatak, Linked Case : WP(C)/485/2024

Smti Gimen Apang Age: 41 Occupation : Address:Wife of Shri Taying Nokar resident of Ramsing Village PO and PS Jengging Upper Siang District Arunachal Pradesh

VERSUS

The State of AP and 5 Ors Age: 0

Occupation : Address:represented by the Chief Secretary Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar 791111

2:The SecretaryAge: 0 Occupation : Address:Department of Geology and Mining Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar 791111 3:The Member SecretaryAge: 0 Occupation : Address:Arunachal Pradesh State Pollution Control Board Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Naharlagun 791110 4:The Deputy CommissionerAge: 0 Occupation : Address:Yingkiong Upper Siang District Arunachal Pradesh 791002 5:The Divisional Forest OfficerAge: 0 Occupation : Address:Yingkiong Forest Division Upper Siang District Arunachal Pradesh 791002 6:M/s S S Infrazone Pvt LtdAge: 0 Occupation : Address:represented by Shri Darshan Singh having its registered office at Ramsing Village Jengging Upper Siang District Arunachal Pradesh 791002 ------------ Advocate for : Adam TatakAdvocate for : GA (AP) appearing for The State of AP and 5 Ors: Advocate ,appearing for 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, respectively.

Page 1 of 2

BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE

Date : 23-12-2024

ORDER

Heard Mr. T. Tatak, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Ms. A.Talom, learned counsel appearing for the opposite party and Mr. Y. Riram,learned State counsel appearing for the State respondents.

Mr. T. Tatak, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he hasinstructions not to press this interlocutory application. Therefore, he prays thatthe application may be allowed to be withdrawn.

Prayer is allowed.

Accordingly, interlocutory application stands dismissed on withdrawal.

JUDGE

Comparing Assistant

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead