Gauhati High Court
Bail Appln./2601/2020 of RAHMAN GAM Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 22 December 2020
GAHC010167262020 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2601/2020 RAHMAN GAM S/O LT. KIDUL GAM, VILL-BOGORI GURI, P.S.-GARMUR, DIST-MAJULI VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the
GAHC010167262020
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./2601/2020
RAHMAN GAM
S/O LT. KIDUL GAM, VILL-BOGORI GURI, P.S.-GARMUR, DIST-MAJULI
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR G PHUKAN
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HITESH KUMAR SARMA
22.12.2020:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Heard Mr. G. Phukan, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. N. J.Dutta, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam for the State respondent.
This is an application, filed under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. seeking bail of theaccused-petitioner, namely, Sri Rahman Gam, in connection with Gingia PS Case No.184/2020 registered under Sections 21(b) of NDPS Act.
The petitioner has sought for bail only on the ground of length of detention, i.e.58 days as on date.
Mr. N. J. Dutta, learned Additional Public Prosecutor has submitted that case dairy is available and has subscribed to the submission that the petitioner has been incustody for 58 days as on date.
Considering the nature of the offence alleged, the stage of investigation of thecase and the detention of the petitioner in custody for 58 days, in the considered viewof this Court, further custodial detention of the petitioner is not necessary in theinterest of the investigation of the case. Therefore, the accused-petitioner is grantedbail.
Accordingly, the accused-petitioner, named above, shall be released on bail inconnection with Gingia PS Case No. 184/2020 onfurnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/-with a suitable surety of the like amount, to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge,Biswanath Chariali.
The direction for bail is further subject to the conditions that the accused-petitioner:
(a) shall not leave the territorial jurisdiction of learned Special Judge,Biswanath Chariali, without prior written permission from him; Biswanath Chariali, without prior written permission from him; (b) shall not hamper with the investigation, or tamper with theevidence of the case; and evidence of the case; and
(c) shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat orpromise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as todissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any policeofficer. promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as todissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any policeofficer.
The petition stands disposed of accordingly. Return the case dairy.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant