Gauhati High Court

I.A.(Civil)/2311/2020 of PRABHAT KALITA Vs THE STATE BANK OF INDIA AND 3 ORS. on 22 December 2020

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010192942020 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2311/2020 PRABHAT KALITA S/O. LATE SRIRAM KALITA, R/O. VILL. BOHOTIAGAON, TARAJAN, BAPUJI NAGAR, P.O. R.R.L, P.S. JORHAT, DIST. JORHAT, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE BANK OF

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

GAHC010192942020

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2311/2020

PRABHAT KALITA S/O. LATE SRIRAM KALITA, R/O. VILL. BOHOTIAGAON, TARAJAN, BAPUJI NAGAR, P.O. R.R.L, P.S. JORHAT, DIST. JORHAT, ASSAM

VERSUS

THE STATE BANK OF INDIA AND 3 ORS. REP. BY THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, LOCAL HEAD OFFICE, DISPUR, GUWAHATI, KAMRUP (M), ASSAM

2:BRANCH MANAGER KATAIKIPUKHURI BRANCH P.O. R.R.L DIST- JORHAT ASSAM PIN- 7850013:SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE JORHAT OFFICE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE JORHAT4:OFFICER-IN-CHARGE JORHAT P.S. DIST- JORHAT ASSA

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M BISWAS

Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM

Linked Case : WP(C)/6324/2018PRABHAT KALITAS/O- LT SIRAM KALITA R/O- VILL- BOHOTIAGAON TARAJAN BAPUJI NAGAR P.O. R.R.L P.S. JORHAT DIST- JORHAT (ASSAM)

VERSUS

THE STATE BANK OF INDIA AND 3 ORS.REP. BY THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER LOCAL HEAD OFFICE DISPUR GHY KAMRUP (M) ASSAM2:BRANCH MANAGERKATAIKIPUKHURI BRANCH P.O. R.R.L DIST- JORHAT ASSAM PIN- 785001 3:SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICEJORHAT OFFICE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE JORHAT 4:OFFICER-IN-CHARGEJORHAT P.S. DIST- JORHAT ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR. M BISWASAdvocate for : GA ASSAM appearing for THE STATE BANK OF INDIA AND 3 ORS.

BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI

Date : 22-12-2020

ORDER

Heard Shri M. Biswas, learned counsel for the applicant who has filed thisapplication for correction of a typographical error which was inadvertently made inthe writ petition.

The bank account which was the subject matter was written in the petition1039341971 which has been reflected in the order dated 15.12.2020.

However, the same should be 10392341971.

Accordingly, the order dated 15.12.2020 stands corrected by correctly statingthe bank account as 10392341971.

The present order may be read as a part of the order dated 15.12.2020.

JUDGE

Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead