Madhya Pradesh High Court

MCRC/4375/2024 of PHOOL CHAND SINGH Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH on 2 February 2024

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT JABALPUR

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VISHAL DHAGATON THE 2[nd] OF FEBRUARY, 2024

MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 4375 of 2024

BETWEEN:-

PHOOL CHAND SINGH S/O SHRI BHOLA SINGH GOND,AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCCUPATION: LABOR R/OVILLAGE BHAMARHA P.S. BEOHARI DISTRICTSHAHDOL (MADHYA PRADESH).

(BY SHRI AVI SINGH - ADVOCATE)

.....APPLICANT

AND

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH POLICESTATION BEOHARI DISTRICT SHAHDOL (MADHYAPRADESH).

(BY SHRI PRAMOD CHOUBEY - GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE)

.....RESPONDENT

This application coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

This is the third bail application filed by applicant under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail relating to FIRNo.582/2023, registered at Police Station-Beohari, District Shahdol (M.P.) forthe offence punishable under Sections 8/20-B of NDPS Act.

2. Learned counsel appearing for applicant submitted that applicant isinnocent and has falsely been implicated in the case. Independent seizurewitnesses have been examined and they are hostile in Court. Applicant is firsttime offender with no criminal record. He is in jail since 20.07.2023. In these circumstances, applicant be released on bail.

3. Learned Government Advocate appearing for the State opposed the bail application.

4. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

5. Considering the fact that seizure witnesses have turned hostile and thefact that applicant is first time offender, bail application filed by the applicant isallowed. It is directed that the applicant shall be released on bail on hisfurnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trialCourt concerned for his regular appearance before Court on all such dates as may be fixed in this regard during pendency of trial.

6. The applicant shall also abide by the following conditions of Section 437(3) of Cr. P. C. as under:- (a) that such person shall attend in accordance with the conditionsof the bond executed under this Chapter; (b) that such person shall not commit any offence similar to theoffence of which he is accused, or suspected of the commissionof which he is suspected and;

(c) that such person shall not directly or indirectly make anyinducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with thefacts of the case as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts tothe Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

7. Certified copy as per rules.

vkt

(VISHAL DHAGAT)JUDGE

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead