Allahabad High Court
CRLP/11284/2025 of RAM SIYA MANAGER GYAN BHARTI INTER COLLEGE Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS on 29 May 2025
No. - 2025:AHC:94710-DB Court No. - 42 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11284 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Siya Manager Gyan Bharti Inter College Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Sajiwan Prajapati Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra
Court No. - 42
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11284 of 2025Petitioner :- Ram Siya Manager Gyan Bharti Inter CollegeRespondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 OthersCounsel for Petitioner :- Ram Sajiwan PrajapatiCounsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.'Honble Anil Kumar-X,J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the Staterespondents.
2. Present petition has been filed to pray for issuance of directions to respondents to ensure fair, impartial and proper investigation of the Case Crime No.0908 of 2016under Sections 467, 468, 471, 409, 506, 448 of IPC, at Police Station KarviKotwali, District Chitrakoot.
3. Learned counsel has prayed for issuance of suitable direction for fair andimpartial investigation.
4. This instant writ petition has been preferred with a prayer to that a direction maybe issued to the authority concerned for ensuring fair investigation in this matter.
5. We find that for the same cause of action, the petitioner had earlier preferred aCriminal Misc. Writ Petition No.35705 of 2018 which was disposed of on10.12.2018.
6. Later on as it is informed by the petitioner counsel that final report wassubmitted in the said matter before the concerned Magistrate.. Further, it wasdirected that the investigation be conducted fairly and speedily.
7. In this back drop, learned counsel for the petitioner states that in spite ofsufficient time, till date, such further investigation has not been ensured.
8. Considering the factual situation, we are not inclined to entertain the instant writpetition suffice to indicate the petitioner at liberty to press the appropriate relief inaccordance with law before the concerned Magistrate.
9. Petition is disposed off.
(Anil Kumar-X,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.)