Madhya Pradesh High Court
MA/1675/2014 of SMT.KANUBAI Vs DINESH on 2 February 2024
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT INDOREBEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE DEVNARAYAN MISHRAON THE 2[nd] OF FEBRUARY, 2024
MISC. APPEAL No. 1675 of 2014
BETWEEN:-
1.SMT.KANUBAI W/O LATE DHULIYA, AGED 40YEARS, OCCUPATION: HOUSEWIFE R/O JALIBORFA GRAM BADAKHUTAJA (MADHYA PRADESH)YEARS, OCCUPATION: HOUSEWIFE R/O JALIBORFA GRAM BADAKHUTAJA (MADHYA PRADESH)
2.KAMLESH S/O DHULIYA, AGED18 YEARS, R/OJALIBOR FA GRAM BADAKHUTAJA, TEH-BHABHRA (MADHYA PRADESH)JALIBOR FA GRAM BADAKHUTAJA, TEH-BHABHRA (MADHYA PRADESH)
3.RAJU MINOR THROUGH MOTHER SMT. KANUBAIS/O DHULIYA, AGED 17 YEARS, R/O JALIBOR FAGRAM BADAKHUTAJA, TEH-BHABHRA (MADHYAPRADESH)S/O DHULIYA, AGED 17 YEARS, R/O JALIBOR FAGRAM BADAKHUTAJA, TEH-BHABHRA (MADHYAPRADESH)
4.PRATAP MINOR THROUGH MOTHER SMT.KANUBAI S/O DHULIYA, AGED 16 YEARS, R/OJALIBOR FA GRAM BADAKHUTAJA, TEH-BHABHRA (MADHYA PRADESH)KANUBAI S/O DHULIYA, AGED 16 YEARS, R/OJALIBOR FA GRAM BADAKHUTAJA, TEH-BHABHRA (MADHYA PRADESH)
5.ZABU MINOR THROUGH MOTHER SMT. KANUBAIS/O DHULIYA, AGED 14 YEARS, R/O JALIBOR FAGRAM BADAKHUTAJA, TEH-BHABHRA (MADHYAPRADESH)S/O DHULIYA, AGED 14 YEARS, R/O JALIBOR FAGRAM BADAKHUTAJA, TEH-BHABHRA (MADHYAPRADESH)
6.BHUVA MINOR THROUGH MOTHER SMT.KANUBAI S/O DHULIYA, AGED 6 YEARS, R/OJALIBOR FA GRAM BADAKHUTAJA, TEH-BHABHRA (MADHYA PRADESH)KANUBAI S/O DHULIYA, AGED 6 YEARS, R/OJALIBOR FA GRAM BADAKHUTAJA, TEH-BHABHRA (MADHYA PRADESH)
(NONE PRESENT FOR THE APPELLANTS)
.....APPELLANTS
AND
1.DINESH S/O KILAN RATHORE, AGED 26 YEARS,OCCUPATION: VEHICLE DRIVER R/O GRAMWANKIYA P.S. GARBADA TEH. AND DISTT.DAHOD (GUJARAT)OCCUPATION: VEHICLE DRIVER R/O GRAMWANKIYA P.S. GARBADA TEH. AND DISTT.DAHOD (GUJARAT)
2.BHAVSINGH S/O ANOPSINGH ALIAS APSINGHRATHORE GRAM-WANKIYA, P.S. GARBADA, TEHAND DISTT-DAHOD (GUJARAT)
3.BRANCH MANAGER UNITED INDIA INSURANCECO. LTD. ZONAL OFFICE, ABHAY PRASHAL(MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(SHRI PRADIP KUMAR GUPTA - ADVOCATE FOR THE RESPONDENT NO.3AND SHRI ADITYA SINGH - ADVOCATE FOR THE RESPONDENTS NO.1AND 2).
This appeal coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
None appears for the appellants. On the last dates of hearing i.e., on16.07.2018, 21.01.2019, 05.03.2019, 26.06.2019, 27.08.2019 and 18.10.2019also no one had appeared on behalf of the appellants. It appears that theappellants are not interested in prosecuting this appeal.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Copy of the order be sent to the Claims Tribunal.
Shruti
(DEVNARAYAN MISHRA)JUDGE