Supreme Court of India
STATE OF KERALA versus M.M. ABDUL KHADER on 15 December 1995
1995 INSC 909[1995] SUPP. 6 S.C.R. 784
A
STATE OF KERALA
v.
M.M. ABDUL KHADER
DECEMBER 15, 1995
B [K. RAMASWAMY AND B.L. HANSARIA, JJ.]
Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
S. 23(1-Aj-Award of Collector being dated 21.4.1980-Claimants nor C entitled ro benefits under the section.
The State Government filed appeal against the jndgment of the High Court allowing the claimants, the benefits of s. 23(1-A) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
D Allowing the appeal, this Court
HELD : Since the award of the Collector is of April, 21, 1980, the claimants are not entitled to the additional amount under s. 23 (l·A) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. [785-C]
E CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 12120 of 1995.
From the Judgment and Order dated 28.1.93 of the Kerala High Court in L.A.A. No. 244 of 1988.
F
M.T. George for the Appellants.
N. Sudahakaran for the Respondents.
The following Order of the Court was delivered :
G Leave granted.
The only controversy is as regards the entitlement of the respondents to the additional amount under Section 23(1-A) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Since the award of the Collector is of June 4, 1979, the claimants are not entitled to the additional amount under Section 23(1-A) of the said H Act.
Page 1 of 2
The appeal is accordingly allowed to the above extent. The Order of A the High Court is set aside. No costs.
CA. No. 12121 of 1995
Leave granted.
B The only controversy with which we are concerned in this appeal is as regards the entitlement of the respondents to the additional amount under Section 23(1-A) of the Land Acquisition Ac~ 1894. Since the award of the Collector is of April 21, 1980, the claimants are not entitled to the additional amount under Section 23(1-A) of the said Act.
c
The appeal is accordingly allowed to the above extent. The order of the High Court is set aside. No costs.
R.P.
Appeals allowed.
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…