Madhya Pradesh High Court
MCRC/10019/2013 of LAXMAN SINGH Vs STATE OF M.P on 30 December 2013
Anr. Vs. State of M.P. 30.12.2013 Shri R.K.Goyal,
Arguments
30.12.2013
Shri R.K.Goyal, Advocate for the applicants.Shri Ayub Khan, P.P. for the respondent/State.
Heard.
This is first application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. arising out of Crime No.281/2013 registered at Police Station Gormi, District Bhind for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 452, 336, 323 and 294/34 of IPC.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant No.1 is about 62 years of age and, therefore, on the ground of age itself, he deserves bail. It is contended that the applicants are falsely implicated.
Prayer is opposed by the other side.
I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary.
As per the prosecution story, Pawan Saingh used the farsa and Laxman Singh attacked by 'Kulhadi'. The medical report prima-facie supports the story of the prosecution. There is lacerated wound found on the forehead of the complainant.
Considering the aforesaid, in my opinion, it is not a fit case to enlarge the applicants on bail at this stage. Considering the gravity of allegation/nature of acquisition, ultimate punishment in the event of conviction and other circumstances, this bail application is liable to be dismissed. It is accordingly dismissed.
(Sujoy Paul)
Vacation Judge
Page 1 of 1
Loading citations and judicial treatment…