MCRC/9628/2012 of PRAMOD @ GATUA Vs STATE OF M.P. on 27 December 2012

Arguments

M.Cr.C. No. 9628/2012(Pramod alias Gatua Vs. State of M.P.)

27/12/2012

Shri R.K.Sharma, Advocate for the applicant.

Smt.Sangeeta Pachauri Public Prosecutor for the respondent/State.

Shri Sanjeev Agrawal, Advocate for the complainant.Heard.

The applicant has filed first bail application under Section 439 of Cr. P.C. for grant of bail in connection with Crime No.575/2011 registered at Police Station Civil Lines, Morena for offences punishable under Sections 307 and 294/34 of IPC.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that a false case has been registered against the applicant, however, the injury on thigh vertical has come to the injured, which is not feasibly possible in a case for the offence under Section 307 IPC. The applicant is in custody since 20.11.2012. On these grounds, learned counsel for the applicant prayed to enlarge the applicant on bail.

Learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant opposed the bail application and prayed for its rejection.

Considering the facts of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, application is allowed and the applicant is directed to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing a personal bond of SP

M.Cr.C. No. 9628/2012(Pramod alias Gatua Vs. State of M.P.)

Rs.50,000/-(Rupees Fifty Thousand only) with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court for his regular appearance during pendency of the trial and he shall also comply with the conditions as enumerated under Section 437 (3) of Cr. P. C.

A copy of this order be sent to the court concerned for information and compliance.

Certified copy as per rules.

(J.K.Maheshwari)

Vacation Judge