Madhya Pradesh High Court

SA/1501/2019 of SALIM Vs VIKRAM SINGH on 2 February 2024

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT INDORE

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL VERMAON THE 2[nd] OF FEBRUARY, 2024

SECOND APPEAL No. 1501 of 2019

BETWEEN:-

SALIM S/O AJIJ KHAN, AGED 51 YEARS, OCCUPATION:KRISHI AND BUSINESS SARDAR CHIKEN CENTRE,OPPOSITE-IDGAH MASJID, DEWAS (MADHYAPRADESH)

(NONE FOR APPELLANT)

.....APPELLANT

AND

1.VIKRAM SINGH S/O DEVI SINGH BHEEL VILLAGE-KALUKHEDI, TEHSIL AND DISTT.-DEWAS,PRESENTLY VILLAGE-JAMGOD, TEHSIL ANDDISTT.-DEWAS (ORIGINAL PLAINTIFF)KALUKHEDI, TEHSIL AND DISTT.-DEWAS,PRESENTLY VILLAGE-JAMGOD, TEHSIL ANDDISTT.-DEWAS (ORIGINAL PLAINTIFF)

2.HAFIJ S/O AJIJ KHAN SARDAR CHIKEN CENTER,OPPOSITE IDGAH MASJID, DEWAS/MOMANTOLA(SHAMSHAN ROAD), DEWAS (MADHYA PRADESH)(ORIGINAL DEFENDANT NO.2)OPPOSITE IDGAH MASJID, DEWAS/MOMANTOLA(SHAMSHAN ROAD), DEWAS (MADHYA PRADESH)(ORIGINAL DEFENDANT NO.2)

3.AJIJ KHAN S/O HASAN KHAN (ORIGINALDEFENDANT NO.3) DECEASED THROUGH LRS :- (A) SARFARAZ KHAN S/O LATE AJIJKHANR/O MOMANTOLA (SHAMSHAN ROAD),DEWAS (MADHYA PRADESH)DEFENDANT NO.3) DECEASED THROUGH LRS :- (A) SARFARAZ KHAN S/O LATE AJIJKHANR/O MOMANTOLA (SHAMSHAN ROAD),DEWAS (MADHYA PRADESH)

(B)AYAJ KHAN S/O AJIJ KHAN (LATE ) R/O SUTARBAKHAL, DEWAS (MADHYA PRADESH)BAKHAL, DEWAS (MADHYA PRADESH)

(C)FIROZ KHAN S/O LATE AJIJ KHAN R/O 42,MUKTI MARG, DEWAS (MADHYA PRADESH)MUKTI MARG, DEWAS (MADHYA PRADESH)

(D)RASHID KHAN S/O LATE AJIJ KHAN 24, IDGAHROAD, DEWAS (MADHYA PRADESH)ROAD, DEWAS (MADHYA PRADESH)

4.THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGHCOLLECTOR, OFFICE OF THE COLLECTOR,DEWAS MP (ORIGINAL DEFENDANT NO.4) DEWASCOLLECTOR, OFFICE OF THE COLLECTOR,DEWAS MP (ORIGINAL DEFENDANT NO.4) DEWAS

(MADHYA PRADESH)

.....RESPONDENTS

This appeal coming on for admission this day, the court passed thefollowing:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

On 8.11.2019 also none had appeared on behalf of appellant.

2. The non appearance of the appellant is sufficient to show that he isnot interested in prosecuting this appeal. Therefore, this second appeal isdismissed for want of prosecution.

3. Record of the courts below be returned back to the courts below with a copy of this order.

BDJ

(ANIL VERMA)JUDGE

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead