Madhya Pradesh High Court

MCC/182/2024 of PRATYUSH PANDEY ALIAS AYUSH PANDEY Vs RAJBAHORE KOL on 2 February 2024

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT JABALPUR

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE DWARKA DHISH BANSALON THE 2[nd] OF FEBRUARY, 2024

MISC. CIVIL CASE No. 182 of 2024

BETWEEN:-

PRATYUSH PANDEY ALIAS AYUSH PANDEY S/O SHRIASHOK PANDEY, AGED ABOUT 5 YEARS, OCCUPATION:MINOE THROUGH NATURAL GUARDIAN SHRI ASHOKPANDEY S/O BYANKAT PRASAD PANDEY AGE ABOUT 35YEARS R/O WARD NO. 3, NAGAR PANCHAYATCHURAHAT, P.S. AND TEHSIL CHURAHAT, DISTRICTSIDHI (MADHYA PRADESH)

(BY SHRI V.P. SINGH - ADVOCATE )

.....APPLICANT

AND

1.RAJBAHORE KOL S/O SUKHLAL KOL, AGEDABOUT 35 YEARS, R/O VILLAGE PADKHURI 586,POLICE STATINO AND TEHSIL CHURAHATDISTRICT SIDHI (MADHYA PRADESH)ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/O VILLAGE PADKHURI 586,POLICE STATINO AND TEHSIL CHURAHATDISTRICT SIDHI (MADHYA PRADESH)

2.DEEPANKAR PANDEY S/O SHRI RAMSAJIWANPANDEY R/O VILLAGE CHURAHAT WARD NO.6P.S. AND TAHSIL CHURAHAT DISTRICT SIDHI(OWNER OF VEHICLE NO. TATA 407 NO. MP 53GA/3289) (MADHYA PRADESH)PANDEY R/O VILLAGE CHURAHAT WARD NO.6P.S. AND TAHSIL CHURAHAT DISTRICT SIDHI(OWNER OF VEHICLE NO. TATA 407 NO. MP 53GA/3289) (MADHYA PRADESH)

3.CHOLA MANDLAM MS. GENERAL INSURANCECOMPANY LIMITED , BRANCH OFFICE NEARVIJAY FILLING STATION NORTH KARONDIYA,SIDHI TAHSIL GOPAD BANAS, DISTRICT SIDHI(MADHYA PRADESH)COMPANY LIMITED , BRANCH OFFICE NEARVIJAY FILLING STATION NORTH KARONDIYA,SIDHI TAHSIL GOPAD BANAS, DISTRICT SIDHI(MADHYA PRADESH)

.....RESPONDENTS

This application coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Heard on the question of admission.

2. The present application has been filed for restoration of M.A.No.2304/2021, which was dismissed for want of prosecution vide order dated09.01.2024

3. Considering the averments made in the application, this Court finds thatsufficient cause is shown for restoration of the Misc. Appeal.

4. Accordingly, MCC is allowed.

5. M.A. No.2304/2021 is restored to its original number subject to payment ofcost of Rs.2,000/- (Two thousand only) payable to the State Legal ServicesAuthority, Jabalpur, within a period of seven working days, failing which theorder of dismissal of Misc. Appeal shall remain intact. However, it is made clearthat the applicant/appellant shall not be entitled for any interest for the periodtaken in restoration of the misc. appeal.

6. A copy of this order be kept in the file of M.A. No.2304/2021.

7. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed off.

pb

(DWARKA DHISH BANSAL)JUDGE

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead