Madhya Pradesh High Court
MCRC/57981/2023 of RAVI URF RAVINDRA YADAV Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH on 2 February 2024
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT JABALPURBEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAMOD KUMAR AGRAWALON THE 2[nd] OF FEBRUARY, 2024
MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 57981 of 2023
BETWEEN:-
RAVI URF RAVINDRA YADAV S/O SHRI BHAGIRATHYADAV, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, OCCUPATION:LABOUR R/O KUSHNAGAR PURWA PIPRA THANAKUDILA DISTRICT TIKAMGARH (MADHYA PRADESH)
(BY SHRI J.P. SINGROL - ADVOCATE )
.....APPLICANT
AND
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH STATIONHOUSE OFFICER POLICE STATION KUDILA DISTRICTTIKAMGARH (MADHYA PRADESH)
(BY SHRI MANOJ KUMAR SINGH - PANEL LAWYER )
.....RESPONDENT
This application coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
This is the first bail application filed by the applicant under Section 439of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail relating to CrimeNo.308/2023 registered at Police Station - Kudila, District Tikamgarh (M.P.) forthe offence punishable under Section 34(2) of M.P. Excise Act. Applicant is indetention since 26.10.2023.
2. As per the prosecution story, on receiving an information from aninformant, 72 bulk liters of illicit liquor from possession of the applicant hasbeen seized. FIR was registered.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that applicant is in jailsince 26.10.2023. He has been falsely implicated. Investigation is complete.Charge sheet has been filed. The trial of the case will take considerable time.Therefore, it has been prayed that the applicant may be released on bail pendingthe trial.
4. On the other hand, learned counsel for State has opposed the grant ofbail to the applicant but charge sheet has been filed. He further submits thatapplicant has criminal record of three cases.
5. Having taken into consideration all the facts and circumstances of thecase, but without commenting on merit of the case, I am inclined to release theapplicant on bail. Consequently, bail application under Section 439 of the Codeo f Criminal Procedure for grant of bail filed on behalf of applicant, standsallowed.
6. It is directed that applicant be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) withtwo solvent sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court, forhis regular appearance before the trial Court during trial with a condition that heshall remain present before the concerned Court on all the dates fixed by itduring trial and he is further directed to mark his presence before the concerningPolice Station on the dates i.e. 10th and 25th of every month and is directed tocooperate in trial. He shall abide by all the conditions enumerated underSection 437(3) of Cr.P.C.In case of breach of any of the aforementionedconditions, the bail granted by this Court shall stand rejected automatically.
7. This order shall be effective till the end of the trial. However, in case ofbail jump and breach of any of the conditions of bail, it shall becomeineffective.
Sateesh
Certified copy as per rules.
(PRAMOD KUMAR AGRAWAL)JUDGE