Gujarat High Court
CRA/1147/1992 of LEGAL HEIRS OF DECEASED R.KHOJA:GULBANU RAMJANBHAI KHOJA Vs RAMANBHAI ASHABHAI DESAI on 3 December 1999
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 1147 of 1992 Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 1147 of 1992
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT
============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- LEGAL HEIRS OF DECEASED R.KHOJA:GULBANU RAMJANBHAI KHOJAVersus RAMANBHAI ASHABHAI DESAI -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR SP HASURKAR for Petitioners MR BS PATEL for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT Date of decision: 03/12/1999
ORAL JUDGEMENT
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned counsel for the respondents appearing on behalf of Mr. B.S. Patel states that he has received instructions in writing from the respondent that the petitioner in the present revision (who is the tenant of the suit premises) has already vacated the suit premises. It would, therefore, appear that the present revision has now become infructuous. The revision is accordingly disposed of and rule is discharged with no order as to costs. It is, however, clarified that the interim relief granted in the revision shall continue to operate upto 30th December 1999 to enable learned counsel for the petitioner to verify the situation. Liberty to apply for revival of the revision, if necessary, upto 30th December
1999.
*********