Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/44253/2013 of PARVITA DEVI & ANR. Vs STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. on 30 December 2013
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-44253 of 2013(O&M) Date of Decision: December 30, 2013 Parvita Devi and another .....Petitioners v. State of Haryana and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Petitioners in
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH.
Crl.M.No.M-44253 of 2013(O&M)
Date of Decision: December 30, 2013
Parvita Devi and another
State of Haryana and others
v.
.....Petitioners
......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA
Present:Petitioners in person withMr.P.S.Jammu, Advocate.
Respondents no.5 and 6 in person withMr.Hitesh Verma, Advocate.
.....
RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral)
The present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is forissuance of direction to respondent nos.1 to 4 to protect the life and libertyof the petitioners at the hands of respondent nos.5 and 6.
Heard.
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitionerswill be satisfied if respondent no.2, i.e.,Superintendent of Police, Sirsa, isdirected to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, on application,dated 27.12.2013, Annexure P5, already made to him by the petitioners.
As per averments made in the petition both the petitioners aremajor. Date of birth of petitioner no.1-Parvita, as per copy of SecondarySchool Examination Certificate, Annexure P1, is 20.4.1989, and date ofbirth of petitioner No.2- Kuldeep Singh, as per copy of MatriculationExamination Certificate, Annexure P2, is 5.12.1983. They got married on27.12.2013, as per marriage certificate, Annexure P3. Photographs of themarriage are Annexure P4.
In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for thepetitioners and without going into the merits of the claim raised by thepetitioners, this petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no.2,Meenui.e.,Superintendent of Police, Sirsa, to take appropriate action, in accordance2014.01.03 13:34I attest to the accuracy andintegrity of this documentchandigarh with law, on application, dated 27.12.2013, Annexure P5, already stated tohave been moved to him by the petitioners.
However, it is made clear that this order will be having noeffect on the validity of alleged marriage of petitioners and also on anyother civil or criminal proceedings instituted against petitioner no.2 as perlaw.
30.12.2013
meenu
(Ram Chand Gupta)Judge