Madhya Pradesh High Court
WP/20311/2020 of RAMESH KUMAR CHOUBEY Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH on 31 December 2020
V. JUDGE The High Court Of Madhya PradeshThe High Court Of
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Signature Not VerifiedSAN
The High Court Of Madhya PradeshWP-20311-2020
(RAMESH KUMAR CHOUBEYVs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS)
[31][-][12][-][2020]Jabalpur, Dated :
Heard through Video Conferencing.
Shri Atul Kumar Rai, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Shri Jubin Prasad, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondents/State.
By the instant petition, the petitioner is challenging the recovery as also the amount of interest imposed over the said amount of recovery.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents havealready recovered the proposed amount of recovery i.e. Rs.12,34,827/- alongwith the amount of interest imposed over the same i.e. Rs.8,41,656/- from thepetitioner, but in view of the law laid down by this Court in number of writpetitions, copies of some of the orders are filed along with the petitioncollectively as Annexure-P/5, the amount of interest i.e. Rs.8,41,656/- cannotbe recovered from the petitioner.
Considering the aforesaid and also considering the order passed bythis Court in W.P. No.15780/2020 (Harish Chandra Minocha Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh and others), in which, it is held that the interestamount cannot be recovered, this petition is disposed of directing therespondents to refund the recovered amount of interest i.e. Rs.8,41,656/-imposed over the proposed amount of recovery to the petitioner asexpeditiously as possible.
With the aforesaid direction, this petition stands allowed and disposed of.
Certified copy as per rules.
(SANJAY DWIVEDI)V. JUDGE
ac/-