Madhya Pradesh High Court
MCRC/1054/2024 of JUJHARLAL Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH on 5 February 2024
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT INDOREBEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLAON THE 5[th] OF FEBRUARY, 2024
MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 1054 of 2024
BETWEEN:-
JUJHARLAL S/O BHARATLAL, AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS,OCCUPATION: LABOUR VILLAGE RANIGAUN, TEHSILPIPLOUDA, (MADHYA PRADESH)
(BY SHRI VISHAL PATIDAR - ADVOCATE)
AND
1.THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH STATIONHOUSE OFFICER VILLAGE RANIGAUN, TEHSILPIPLOUDA, (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....APPLICANT
2.VICTIM X THROUGH P.S. NAMLI DIST RATLAM(MADHYA PRADESH)
(BY SHRI VINOD THAKUR - PP)
.....RESPONDENTS
This application coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
This is fourth bail application u/S.439 of Cr.P.C. in connection with Crime No.197/2021 registered at P.S. Namli, Distt. Ratlam for offenceu/Ss.363, 366, 376(2)(N), 376(3) of IPC and Sec.5-L/6 POCSO Act.
2. The third application was dismissed as withdrawn and this court hasmade an observation that the trial court shall make all endeavour to expedite thetrial.
3. Counsel for State opposed the prayer for grant of bail on the ground that according to the prosecution, as per scholar register, the age of theprosecutrix is only 12 years 8 months.
4. Considering the same, no case is made out for grant of bail on merit. However, considering the custodial period of the applicant, it is observed thatthe trial court shall make all endeavour to expedite the trial and conclude thesame within six months from the date of filing of copy of this order. If withinsix months the trial is not concluded, the applicant shall be at liberty to revivethe application.
5. With the aforesaid liberty, the application is dismissed.
VM
(VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA)JUDGE