Madhya Pradesh High Court
WP/23507/2017 of GARIMA PATEL Vs THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH on 28 December 2017
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH WP-23507-2017 (GARIMA PATEL Vs THE HIGH COURT OF
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Arguments
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHWP-23507-2017
WP-23507-2017(GARIMA PATELVs THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH)Jabalpur, Dated :28-12-2017Dr. Anuvad Shrivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner.Heard on I.A. Nos.18737/2017 & 18738/2017.In the facts and circumstances of this case and for thereasons mentioned in the said IAs, the same are allowed.Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that thepetitioner submitted her candidature to participate in the MainExamination of M.P. Civil Judge Class-II (Entry Level) 2017after the last date of submission of candidature. Yet the petitionermay be permitted to participate in the selection process becauseshe has laboured heard to prepare for the examination.We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner on thisaspect.In our opinion, the contention is devoid of substance as thecandidature is admittedly submitted after the last date ofsubmission. No relief is due to the petitioner.Accordingly, petition is devoid of substance and is hereby Dr. Anuvad Shrivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner.Heard on I.A. Nos.18737/2017 & 18738/2017.
In the facts and circumstances of this case and for thereasons mentioned in the said IAs, the same are allowed.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that thepetitioner submitted her candidature to participate in the MainExamination of M.P. Civil Judge Class-II (Entry Level) 2017after the last date of submission of candidature. Yet the petitionermay be permitted to participate in the selection process becauseshe has laboured heard to prepare for the examination.
We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner on thisaspect.
In our opinion, the contention is devoid of substance as thecandidature is admittedly submitted after the last date ofsubmission. No relief is due to the petitioner.
Accordingly, petition is devoid of substance and is hereby dismissed.
(SUJOY PAUL)
V. JUDGE
(RAJEEV KUMAR DUBEY)
V. JUDGE
s@if
Digitally signed by SAIFAN KHAN Date: 2017.12.28 14:41:57 +05'30'