Madhya Pradesh High Court
MCRC/51713/2018 of MANOJ SENGAR Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH on 31 December 2018
MADHYA PRADESH : BENCH AT INDORE Manoj Sengar Vs. State of M.P.
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : BENCH AT INDOREManoj Sengar Vs. State of M.P.M.Cr.C. No.51713 of 2018
M.Cr.C. No.51713 of 2018
-Indore, Dated: 31/12/2018
Shri Bhaskar Agrawal, learned Counsel for thepetitioner—Manoj Sengar.
Shri Suraj Sharma, learned Public Prosecutor forthe respondent/State.
Heard with the aid of case diary.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
1. This is third bail application under Section 439 ofCr.P.C filed by petitioner—Manoj Sengar in connectionwith Crime No.332/2018, under Section 34(2) of M.P.Excise Act, 1915 registered at Police Station—StationHouse Officer, through P.S. Excise Circle 1, Indore. Heis in custody since 14.08.2018.
2. The allegation against the petitioner is that he washaving 55 bulk litres of illegal liquor in his possession.
3. The objection of the prosecution is that thepetitioner has long criminal record, earlier five criminalcases vide Crime No.609/2010 under Section 379 ofIPC, Crime No.120/2010 under Sections 457 and 380of IPC, Crime No.82/2010, Crime No.340/2011 andCrime No.112/2012 under Sections 452, 336, 294, 323and 34 of IPC have been registered against him.
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : BENCH AT INDOREManoj Sengar Vs. State of M.P.M.Cr.C. No.51713 of 2018
4. The argument of the learned Counsel for thepetitioner that he has no criminal record under ExciseAct and he is in custody since 14.08.2018.
5. Considering the criminal record of the petitionerand other facts and circumstances of the case, I am notinclined to grant bail to the petitioner, therefore, thepetition is dismissed.
pp/
(Virender Singh)
VacationJudge
Digitally signed by Pankaj Pandey
Date: 2018.12.31 16:21:43 +05'30'