Madhya Pradesh High Court
SA/173/2017 of SMT. MAMTA BAI Vs MADHYA PRADESH PASCHIM KSHETRA VIDYUT VITARAN COMPANY LTD. on 2 February 2024
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT INDOREBEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL VERMAON THE 2[nd] OF FEBRUARY, 2024
SECOND APPEAL No. 173 of 2017
BETWEEN:-
1.SMT. MAMTA BAI WD/O LATE RAMKARAN BHIL,AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, OCCUPATION:HOUSEHOLD, R/O: VILLAGE SARSODIYA, TEH.MO. BADODIYA, DISTT. SHAJAPUR (MADHYAPRADESH)AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, OCCUPATION:HOUSEHOLD, R/O: VILLAGE SARSODIYA, TEH.MO. BADODIYA, DISTT. SHAJAPUR (MADHYAPRADESH)
2.ANJALI THROUGH NATURAL GUARDIAN SMT.MAMTA BAI D/O LATE RAMKARAN BHIL, AGEDABOUT 8 YEARS, OCCUPATION: STUDENT, R/O:VILLAGE SARSODIYA, TEH. MO. BADODIYA,DISTT. SHAJAPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)MAMTA BAI D/O LATE RAMKARAN BHIL, AGEDABOUT 8 YEARS, OCCUPATION: STUDENT, R/O:VILLAGE SARSODIYA, TEH. MO. BADODIYA,DISTT. SHAJAPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)
3.RAVINA THROUGH NATURAL GUARDIAN SMT.MAMTA BAI D/O RAMKARAN BHIL, AGED ABOUT5 YEARS, OCCUPATION: STUDENT, R/O: VILLAGESARSODIYA, TEH. MO. BADODIYA, DISTT.SHAJAPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)MAMTA BAI D/O RAMKARAN BHIL, AGED ABOUT5 YEARS, OCCUPATION: STUDENT, R/O: VILLAGESARSODIYA, TEH. MO. BADODIYA, DISTT.SHAJAPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)4.BEERAJ S/O RAMKARAN BHIL, AGED ABOUT 18YE A R S , OCCUPATION: NIL, R/O: VILLAGESARSODIYA, TEH. MO. BADODIYA, DISTT.SHAJAPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)YE A R S , OCCUPATION: NIL, R/O: VILLAGESARSODIYA, TEH. MO. BADODIYA, DISTT.SHAJAPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)
5.BANSHILAL BHIL S/O BHAGIRATH BHIL, AGEDABOUT 71 YEARS, OCCUPATION: NIL, R/O:VILLAGE SARSODIYA, TEH. MO. BADODIYA,DISTT. SHAJAPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)ABOUT 71 YEARS, OCCUPATION: NIL, R/O:VILLAGE SARSODIYA, TEH. MO. BADODIYA,DISTT. SHAJAPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)
6.SMT. SHAITAN BAI W/O BANSHILAL BHIL, AGEDABOUT 66 YEARS, OCCUPATION: NIL, R/O:VILLAGE SARSODIYA, TEH. MO. BADODIYA,DISTT. SHAJAPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)ABOUT 66 YEARS, OCCUPATION: NIL, R/O:VILLAGE SARSODIYA, TEH. MO. BADODIYA,DISTT. SHAJAPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)
(NONE FOR APPELLANTS)
.....APPELLANTS
AND
1.MADHYA PRADESH PASCHIM KSHETRA VIDYUTVITARAN COMPANY LTD. SUPERINTENDENTENGINEER LAL GHATI, SHAJAPUR (MADHYAPRADESH)VITARAN COMPANY LTD. SUPERINTENDENTENGINEER LAL GHATI, SHAJAPUR (MADHYAPRADESH)
2.THE JUNIOR ENGINEER MADHYA PRADESHPASCHIM KSHETRA VIDYUT VITARAN CO. LTD.DISTRIBUTION CENTRE MO. BADODIYA, TEHSILMO. BADODIYA, SHAJAPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)PASCHIM KSHETRA VIDYUT VITARAN CO. LTD.DISTRIBUTION CENTRE MO. BADODIYA, TEHSILMO. BADODIYA, SHAJAPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)
3.SHIVENDRA SINGH S/O RAMSINGH RAJPUTASSISTANT LINEMAN MADHYA PRADESHPASCHIM KSHETRA VIDYUT VITRAN CO. LTD.MO. BADODIYA, TEHSIL BADODIYA, SHAJAPUR(MADHYA PRADESH)ASSISTANT LINEMAN MADHYA PRADESHPASCHIM KSHETRA VIDYUT VITRAN CO. LTD.MO. BADODIYA, TEHSIL BADODIYA, SHAJAPUR(MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
This appeal coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
None appeared on behalf of the appellant today.
2. From perusal of the record, it appears that on 05.09.2017, 27.04.2019, 02.07.2019, 23.11.2019 & 16.01.2020 also nobody had appeared on behalf of the appellant. Repeated non-appearance of theappellant is sufficient to show that the appellant is not interested to prosecutethis second appeal.
3. Hence, this second appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
4. Let record of both the Courts below be returned back to theconcerned trial Court along with a copy of this order.
Certified copy as per rules.