Madhya Pradesh High Court

MCRC/12450/2016 of MOHD MUJIB Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH on 29 December 2016

Cites 0, Cited by 0

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH) 29-12-2016 Shri Anil

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

MCRC-12450-2016

(MOHD MUJIBVs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH)

29-12-2016

Shri Anil Ojha,learned Counsel for theapplicant.

Smt.Mamta Shandilya, learned Dy. Govt.Advocate for the respondent/State.

This is the first application filed by theapplicant under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. forgrant of bail.

The case diary is available.

Arguments heard.

The present applicant has been arrested by the Police Station�Mhow, District Indore inCrime No.542/2016 under Section 376 of IPCand under Section 3 / 4 of Prevention ofChildren from Sexual Offences Act.

According to the prosecution story, on 8.9.2016

the present applicant entered into house of theprosecutrix at about 6.00 a.m. and committedrape on her.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that in statement of the prosecutrix under Section164 of Cr.P.C. before the Magistrate, she didnot support the prosecution case.

Learned counsel for the respondent/State hasopposed this application on the ground that attime of the incident, the prosecutrix was only 15 years and three months of age, according tothe scholar register.

Taking into consideration all the facts andcircumstances of the case, without commentingon the merits of the case, I am of the view thatit is a fit case for grant of bail. This applicationfiled under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. is allowed.Accordingly, it is directed that the applicantshall be released on bail on his furnishingpersonal bond of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees FiftyThousand only) and one surety of the likeamount to the satisfaction of the concernedMagistrate for his appearance on all the datesof hearing as may be directed in this regardduring trial.

He is further directed that on being so releasedon bail, he would comply with the conditionsenumerated under Section 437 (3) of Cr.P.C.meticulously.

Certified copy, as per rules.

(ALOK VERMA)JUDGE

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead