Madhya Pradesh High Court
MCRC/4508/2024 of ANURAG Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH on 2 February 2024
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT JABALPURBEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VISHAL DHAGATON THE 2[nd] OF FEBRUARY, 2024
MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 4508 of 2024
BETWEEN:-
ANURAG S/O SHRI RAMASHANKAR SHRIVASTAV,AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, OCCUPATION: ROJGARSAHAYAK R/O VILLAGE ACHARRA DISTRICTTIKAMGARH M.P. PRESENLTY RESIDING ATCHITRANSH NAGAR TIKAMGARH (MADHYA PRADESH)
(BY SHRI SUNIL K. MISHRA - ADVOCATE)
.....APPLICANT
AND
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH POLICESTATION DIGAURA DISTRICT TIKAMGARH (MADHYAPRADESH)
(BY SHRI NARENDRA CHOURASIA - GOVT. ADVOCATE)
.....RESPONDENTS
This application coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
This is first application filed by applicant under Section 438 of the Codeof Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail relating to CrimeNo.117/2022, registered at Police Station-Digaura District Tikamgarh (MP) forthe offences under Sections 420, 409 of IPC
2. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submitted that applicant isa Gram Rojgar Sahayak. Co-accused in the case namely Ranjeet Yadav &Meera Yadav were released on bail on 17.10.2023 in M.Cr.C.No.46690/2023. Itis submitted that allegations made regarding defalcation of an amount of Rs.91,000/-. Said amount has been deposited before CJM. It is submitted thatfalse allegations were made that road was not built and project was notcompleted. In these circumstances, applicants may be released on anticipatorybail.
3. Learned Government Advocate appearing for the State opposed theanticipatory bail application. It is submitted that offence is serious in nature.
4. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
5. Co-accused persons namely Ranjeet Yadav & Ms. Meera Yadav havebeen released on bail. Defalcated amount has been deposited in Court.
6. Considering aforesaid circumstances of the case, anticipatory bailapplication is allowed. It is directed that in the event of arrest of applicants bythe police in the aforesaid crime, she shall be released on bail on her furnishing apersonal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Arresting officer(Investigating Officer) for their regular appearance before the Police during theinvestigation or before the Court during trial.
7. The applicant is directed to join the investigation immediately and co-operate with the investigating agency. Applicant will further abide by thecondition enumerated in sub-section (2) of Section 438 of the Cr.P.C.
Certified copy as per rules.
nd
(VISHAL DHAGAT)JUDGE