Madhya Pradesh High Court
WP/10874/2020 of VARSHA PANCHAL Vs STATE OF M.P. THROUGH DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION on 2 February 2024
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT INDOREBEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRANAY VERMAON THE 2[nd] OF FEBRUARY, 2024
WRIT PETITION No. 10874 of 2020
BETWEEN:-
VARSHA PANCHAL W/O HEMANT PANCHAL, AGEDABOUT 32 YEARS, OCCUPATION: SERVICE R/O. 450/EWS,MUKHARJEE NAGAR, DEWAS (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....PETITIONER
(BY KAIVALYA RATNAPARKHE, LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THEPETITIONER)
AND
1.STATE OF M.P. THROUGH DEPARTMENT OFSCHOOL EDUCATION PRINCIPAL SECRETARYVALLABH BHAWAN, BHOPAL (MADHYAPRADESH)SCHOOL EDUCATION PRINCIPAL SECRETARYVALLABH BHAWAN, BHOPAL (MADHYAPRADESH)
2.THE COMMISSIONER DIRECTORATE OF PUBLICIN STR UCTION GAUTAM NAGAR, BHOPAL(MADHYA PRADESH)IN STR UCTION GAUTAM NAGAR, BHOPAL(MADHYA PRADESH)
3.DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER SCHOOLEDUCATION DEPARTMENT AB ROAD DEWAS(MADHYA PRADESH)EDUCATION DEPARTMENT AB ROAD DEWAS(MADHYA PRADESH)
4.PRINCIPAL SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENTGOVERNMENT HIGH SCHOOL, TONKKALA(MADHYA PRADESH)
(BY SHRI ANENDRA SINGH PARIHAR - P.L. FOR STATE)
.....RESPONDENTS
This petition coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for the following relief (s):- "1. To direct the respondents to select the candidature of thepetitioner regarding regular appointment and appoint the petitioner aspermanent teacher rather than guest faculty.
2. Any other relief which this Court deems fit."
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that respondent No.2 maybe directed to decide the representation dated 11.6.2020 Annexure P/8 as earlyas possible.
In view of the submission made, respondent No.2 is directed to decidethe pending representation of the petitioner Annexure P/8 and pass theappropriate order thereon in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible.
With the aforesaid direction, the petition stands disposed off.
SS/-
(PRANAY VERMA)JUDGE