Madhya Pradesh High Court
WP/6064/2022 of KRISHNA KUMAR SAKRE Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH on 2 February 2024
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT JABALPURBEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK AGARWALON THE 2[nd] OF FEBRUARY, 2024
WRIT PETITION No. 6064 of 2022
BETWEEN:-
1.KRISHNA KUMAR SAKRE S/O SHRIDULICHANDRA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,OCCUPATION: PRINCIPAL GOVERNMENTBAWANTHADI GURUKUL HIGHER SECONDARYSCHOOL BAMHANI TEHSIL TIRODI DISTRICTBALAGHAT M.P. (MADHYA PRADESH)DULICHANDRA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,OCCUPATION: PRINCIPAL GOVERNMENTBAWANTHADI GURUKUL HIGHER SECONDARYSCHOOL BAMHANI TEHSIL TIRODI DISTRICTBALAGHAT M.P. (MADHYA PRADESH)
2.LAXMAN KUMAR CHANDRVANSI S/O SHRINANHOCHANDRA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,OCCUPATION: PRINCIPAL GOVERNMENTNARAYAN DAS GUPTA HIGHER SECONDARYSCHOOL CHHUAI DISTRICT- SEONI, (M.P.)(MADHYA PRADESH)NANHOCHANDRA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,OCCUPATION: PRINCIPAL GOVERNMENTNARAYAN DAS GUPTA HIGHER SECONDARYSCHOOL CHHUAI DISTRICT- SEONI, (M.P.)(MADHYA PRADESH)
(BY SHRI DINESH KUMAR UPADHYAY - ADVOCATE)
.....PETITIONER
AND
1.THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGHPRINCIPAL SECRETARY SCHOOL EDUCATIONDEPARTMENT MANTRALAYA VALLABH BHAWANBHOPAL M.P. (MADHYA PRADESH)PRINCIPAL SECRETARY SCHOOL EDUCATIONDEPARTMENT MANTRALAYA VALLABH BHAWANBHOPAL M.P. (MADHYA PRADESH)
2.THE COMMISSIONER PUBLIC INSTRUCTION,BHOPAL, M.P. BHOPAL, M.P. (MADHYA PRADESH)BHOPAL, M.P. BHOPAL, M.P. (MADHYA PRADESH)
3.THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER DISTRICTSEONI, M.P. DISTRICT- SEONI (M.P.) (MADHYAPRADESH)SEONI, M.P. DISTRICT- SEONI (M.P.) (MADHYAPRADESH)
4.THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER DISTRICTBALAGHAT, M.P. DISTRICT BALAGHAT, M.P.(MADHYA PRADESH)BALAGHAT, M.P. DISTRICT BALAGHAT, M.P.(MADHYA PRADESH)
5.JILA PANCHAYAT NIWADI THROUGH CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER DISTRICT- SEONI (M.P.)(MADHYA PRADESH)
6.JILA PANCHAYAT NIWADI THROUGH CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER DISTRICT- BALAGHAT(M.P.) (MADHYA PRADESH)
(BY SHRI PRANAY SHUKLA - PANEL LAWYER )
.....RESPONDENTS
This petition coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Petitioner's contention is that his case is squarely covered by a decision of Co-ordinate Bench passed on 04.08.2023 passed in W.P. No. 28660 of2021.
This aspect is not disputed by Shri Pranay Shukla, learned Panel Lawyer for the State.
In view of the aforesaid, this petition is allowed.
Order dated 04.08.2023 passed in W.P. No. 28660 of 2021 shall apply mutatis mutandi to the facts and circumstances of the case.
With consent of both the parties, this writ petition is disposed of in the same terms.
AR
(VIVEK AGARWAL)JUDGE