Sikkim High Court

WP(C)/21/2018 of M/s Sheela Foam Limited Vs State of Sikkim and Ors. on 1 June 2018

COURT OF SIKKIM Record of Proceedings WP(C) No. 21/2018 M/S SHEELA FOAM LIMITED Petitioner (s) VERSUS STATE OF SIKKIM & ORS. Respondent (s) Date: 01/06/2018 CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI For Petitioner (s) : Mr. Boudhayan

WP(C) No. 21/2018

M/S SHEELA FOAM LIMITED

Petitioner (s)

VERSUS

STATE OF SIKKIM & ORS.

Respondent (s)

Date: 01/06/2018

CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI

For Petitioner (s) : Mr. Boudhayan Bhattacharya, Mr. Anindya Bagchi, Mr. Partha Pratim Saha and Mr. Dilip Kumar Tamang, Advocates. Anindya Bagchi, Mr. Partha Pratim Saha and Mr. Dilip Kumar Tamang, Advocates.

For Respondent (s)

: Mr. Karma Thinlay, Sr. Govt. Advocate with Mr. Thinlay Dorjee Bhutia, Govt. Advocate, Mr. S.K. Chettri and Ms. Pollin Rai, Asstt. Govt. Advocates. with Mr. Thinlay Dorjee Bhutia, Govt. Advocate, Mr. S.K. Chettri and Ms. Pollin Rai, Asstt. Govt. Advocates.

…

Questioning the legality and the validity of the Assessment Order dated 27[th] April 2018 (Annexure P-1), the instant Petition is filed on the sole ground that in the light of Sub-Section (3) of Section 42 of the Sikkim Value Added Tax Act, 2005 (for short “the Act”), the Authorities are not competent to pass the impugned Assessment Order after a period of six years imposing assessment to the tune of Rs.14,11,07,953/- (Rupees fourteen crores, eleven lakhs, seven thousand, nine hundred and fifty-three) only, for the period from April 2005 to March, 2012.

Responding to the submission, Mr. Karma Thinlay, learned Senior Government Advocate, submits that the instant Petition is not maintainable at this stage when there is an alternative jk/ds statutory remedy of taking recourse to the appellate forum under Section 73 of the Act is available.

Page 1 of 2

On consideration, we are of the considered view that at this stage, the Petition may not be maintainable, thus, reserving liberty, on the request of learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner, to approach the appellate forum for disposal of the Petition, the Writ Petition is disposed of.

Learned Senior Government Advocate appearing for the Respondent Authorities submits that the Assessment Order shall not be enforced for a period of 15 (fifteen) days from today.

Judge 01.06.2018

Chief Justice

01.06.2018

Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead