Sikkim High Court
WP(C)/30/2018 of Kishan Kumar Bhujel Vs State of Sikkim and Others on 4 October 2023
COURT OF SIKKIM Record of Proceedings WP(C) No. 30 of 2018 KISHAN KUMAR BHUJEL PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF SIKKIM AND OTHERS RESPONDENTS Date: 04.10.2023 CORAM: THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI, JUDGE For Petitioner Mr. S. S. Hamal, Senior Advocate. Mr. Anirudh Gupta, Advocate.
WP(C) No. 30 of 2018
KISHAN KUMAR BHUJEL
PETITIONER
VERSUS
STATE OF SIKKIM AND OTHERS
RESPONDENTS
Date: 04.10.2023
CORAM:
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI, JUDGE
For Petitioner Mr. S. S. Hamal, Senior Advocate.
Mr. Anirudh Gupta, Advocate.
Mr. Pradeep Sharma, Advocate.
For Respondents R-1, R-2 & R-4
Mr. Siddhartha Shankar Dey, Senior Advocate. Mr. Thinlay Dorjee Bhutia, Government Advocate. Mr. Dhruba Jyoti Kapil, Advocate.
R-3
Mr. Karma Thinlay, Senior Advocate Government Counsel).
(Central
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
After hearing Learned Senior Counsel for the Petitioner for almost three hours, Learned Senior Counsel seeks to withdraw the Petition and file afresh.
Learned Counsel for the other parties do not oppose the submission.
Considered, in view of the said submission, Writ Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.
Pending applications also stands disposed of accordingly.
Judge04.10.2023