Sikkim High Court
Cont. Cas(C)/3/2014 of Shri Karma Thinlay Lama & Ors. Vs Dr. B.m. Goswami on 22 August 2014
COURT OF SIKKIM CIVIL JURISDICTION Cont. Cas (C) No. 03/2014 Karma Thinlay Lama & Ors. vs. Dr. B.M. Goswami & Ors. BEFORE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N.K. JAIN HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P. WANGDI, JUDGE 05. 22.08.14 Present: M/s. Dr. Doma T. Bhutia and Sarita Bhusal,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM CIVIL JURISDICTION
Cont. Cas (C) No. 03/2014 Karma Thinlay Lama & Ors. vs. Dr. B.M. Goswami & Ors.
BEFORE
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N.K. JAIN HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P. WANGDI, JUDGE
05. 22.08.14 Present: M/s. Dr. Doma T. Bhutia and Sarita Bhusal, (Jain, CJ)Advocates for the petitioners. (Jain, CJ)Advocates for the petitioners.
M/s A. Moulik, Sr. Advocate with K.D. Bhutia and Manish Kr. Jain, Advocates for respondent No. 1.
M/s. S.K. Chettri and Pollin Rai, Asstt. Govt. Advocates and D.K. Siwakoti, Advocate for State-respondents No. 2 to 5.
…
Petitioners have preferred this Contempt Petition with the prayer to pass an order for initiating contempt of court proceedings against respondents/ contemners and to punish them and further to stay the construction of Face-6 of the Adit-II.
2. Neither in the subject matter, nor in the prayer, the date of order has been mentioned, which is to have been violated. However, in the contempt petition, there is a reference of an interim order dated 12.12.2013 and a photocopy of the certified copy thereof, has been annexed as Annexure P-1.
3. Learned counsel for petitioners submitted that she has filed the Transfer Petition No. 02/2014 before this Court to transfer the main writ petition i.e. W.P.(PIL) No. 06/2013 to the National Green Tribunal, Principal Seat at Delhi, as some environmental issues are involved in the writ petition. Therefore, this Contempt Petition for disobedience of the order of this Court may also be transferred along with main writ petition (PIL) No. 06/2013.
4. Respondents have filed their replies/counter affidavits to the contempt petition.
5. We have considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties. It is relevant to mention that the Transfer Petition No. 02/2014 has been dismissed, after hearing the learned counsel for the parties. Even otherwise, the contempt petition has been filed for disobedience of order of this Court. Therefore, we have examined this contempt petition as well as replies/ counter affidavits thereto. We have also examined the order of this Court dated 12.12.2013 passed in Stay Application i.e. CMA No. 155/2013, which is alleged to have been disobeyed by respondents.
6. After considering the facts and allegations in the contempt petition and counter affidavits thereto filed by respondents, in the light of order of this Court dated pm/jk 12.12.2013, we are satisfied that respondents have not violated the order of this Court and they have complied with the direction of this Court.
7. In these circumstances, we do not intend to keep this contempt petition pending anymore and the same is, accordingly, dismissed. Notice of contempt stands discharged.
Judge Chief Justice 22.08.2014 22.08.2014
Index : Yes/ No Internet : Yes / No