Sikkim High Court
WP(C)/29/2021 of GANGA RAM SAPKOTA Vs STATE OF SIKKIM AND ORS. on 20 April 2022
COURT OF SIKKIM Record of proceedings W.P. (C) No.29 of 2021 GANGA RAM SAPKOTA .... PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF SIKKIM & ORS. .... RESPONDENTS Date: 20.04.2022 CORAM HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BHASKAR RAJ PRADHAN, J. For Petitioner : Mr. B. Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Safal Sharma,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
W.P. (C) No.29 of 2021
GANGA RAM SAPKOTA
.... PETITIONER
VERSUS
STATE OF SIKKIM & ORS.
.... RESPONDENTS
Date: 20.04.2022
CORAM
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BHASKAR RAJ PRADHAN, J.
For Petitioner : Mr. B. Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Safal Sharma, Advocate.
For Respondents : Dr. Doma T. Bhutia, Additional Advocate General.
Mr. S.K. Chettri, Government Advocate.
Ms. Pema Bhutia, Assistant Government Advocate.
..........
Mr. B. Sharma, learned Senior Advocate for the petitioner desires to withdraw the writ petition. He also seeks liberty to file afresh. He submits that he desires to move a representation before the Government.
Dr. Doma T. Bhutia, learned Additional Advocate General submits that the writ petition is not maintainable and therefore, no liberty should be granted to file afresh.
The stand of the Government in the reply to the additional affidavit is that the retirement benefits of the petitioner has not been finalised as yet. In fact as pointed out by the learned Additional Advocate General, by a letter dated 23.04.2021 the Department of Personnel (DOP) had sought certain required NOCs from the petitioner. In view of the same, it is clear that if the petitioner files or has already filed the required documents it would be considered and appropriate orders as per law passed.
HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM Record of proceedings The petitioner is permitted to withdraw the writ petition. No liberty can be granted to the petitioner to reagitate the issues covered by this writ petition except the issue of post retirement benefits as above. For any cause of action arising afresh he has the right to seek legal remedy available to him. The writ petition stands disposed as withdrawn.
Judge
Index: yes/Noto/ Internet: yes/No