Sikkim High Court
WP(C)/39/2019 of Kala Devi Subba and ors Vs State Of Sikkim and ors. on 6 April 2021
SIKKIM Record of Proceedings WP(C) No. 39/2019 KALA DEVI SUBBA AND ORS. PETITIONER (S) VERSUS STATE OF SIKKIM AND ORS. RESPONDENT (S) For Petitioners : MS. Laxmi Chakraborty, Advocate. For Respondents No. : Mr. Sudesh Joshi, Addl. Advocate General. 1, 5 & 6 Mr. Sujan Sunwar, Asst. Govt.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
WP(C) No. 39/2019
KALA DEVI SUBBA AND ORS.
PETITIONER (S)
VERSUS
STATE OF SIKKIM AND ORS.
RESPONDENT (S)
For Petitioners : MS. Laxmi Chakraborty, Advocate.
For Respondents No. : Mr. Sudesh Joshi, Addl. Advocate General. 1, 5 & 6 Mr. Sujan Sunwar, Asst. Govt. Advocate. 1, 5 & 6 Mr. Sujan Sunwar, Asst. Govt. Advocate.
For Respondents No. : 2, 3 & 4 For Respondent No.7 : 2, 3 & 4 For Respondent No.7 :
Mr. D.K. Siwakoti, Advocate.
Mr. Sajal Sharma, Advocate.
Date: 06/04/2021
CORAM :
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR MAHESHWARI, CJ. …
Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.
In the present case, as directed earlier the amendment has to be made by the counsel for the petitioner. Learned counsel contends that in place of moving of an application for amendment, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the petition with a liberty to file a fresh petition joining all relevant pleadings.
Prayer seems to be reasonable, therefore, allowed.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition.
Chief Justice