Sikkim High Court
WP (Crl.)/5/2013 of Vinay Rai Vs State Of Sikkim and Ors. on 15 May 2014
COURT OF SIKKIM CRIMINAL JURISDICTION W.P.(Crl.) No. 05/2014 Vinay Rai vs. State of Sikkim BEFORE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N.K. JAIN 04. 15.05.14 Present: M/s. Shakeel Ahmed, S.P. Bhutia, Yogesh Sharma and Chitra Sharma, Advocates for the Petitioner. M/s. J.B. Pradhan, Public
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
W.P.(Crl.) No. 05/2014 Vinay Rai vs. State of Sikkim BEFORE
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N.K. JAIN
04. 15.05.14 Present: M/s. Shakeel Ahmed, S.P. Bhutia, Yogesh Sharma and Chitra Sharma, Advocates for the Petitioner. and Chitra Sharma, Advocates for the Petitioner.
M/s. J.B. Pradhan, Public Prosecutor, Karma Thinlay, Addl. Public Prosecutor with S.K. Chettri and Pollin Rai, Asstt. Public Prosecutors for State-respondents.
…
The Writ Petition is disposed off, vide Judgment delivered in separate sheets.
Chief Justice
15.05.2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
Crl. M. Appl. No. 23/2014 in W.P.(Crl.) No. 05/2014 Vinay Rai vs. State of Sikkim BEFORE
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N.K. JAIN
01. 15.05.14 Present: M/s. Shakeel Ahmed, S.P. Bhutia, Yogesh Sharma and Chitra Sharma, Advocates for the Petitioner.
M/s. J.B. Pradhan, Public Prosecutor, Karma Thinlay, Addl. Public Prosecutor with S.K. Chettri and Pollin Rai, Asstt. Public Prosecutors for State-respondents. …
Since the main Writ Petition No. 05 of 2014 itself has been disposed off, therefore, there is no need to pass any order in this application, and the same stands disposed off.