Madhya Pradesh High Court
MCRC/22727/2015 of SMT. PRIYANKA NAVTANI Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH on 31 December 2015
NAVTANI Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH) 31-12-2015
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
MCRC-22727-2015
(SMT. PRIYANKA NAVTANIVs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH)
31-12-2015
Shri Nandlal Bachwani, Advocate for the applicants.Shri Vaibhav Tiwari, Panel Lawyer for the respondent/State.Shri Sourabh K. Sharma, Advocate for the complainant.The complainant has filed an application along with the affidavit anddocuments for taking objection on record. The same is allowed.Admit.
Heard finally. Perused the case diary.This is the first bail application on behalf of the applicants under Section438 of Cr.P.C.
The applicants have an apprehension of their arrest in connection withCrime No.570/2015 registered at Police Station Madhavnagar, DistrictKatni (M.P.) for the offence punishable under Sections 498-A & 34 of IPCand Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicants that the applicantsare innocent and have been falsely implicated in the case. It is furthersubmitted that applicant Nos. 2 & 3 are the in-laws of the complainantand applicant No.1 Priyanka is married sister of the husband of thecomplainant Poonam and all these persons are not having any directrelations with the incident. The applicants are reputed citizen of thelocality in the event of arrest their reputation will be tarnished,therefore, they be released on anticipatory bail.
Learned Panel Lawyer for the respondent/State as well as learned counsel for the complainant vehemently opposed the application forgrant of anticipatory bail.
Keeping in view the submissions made by learned counsel for theparties and the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressingany view on the merit of the case, I am of the view that this is a fit case for grant anticipatory bail to the applicants. Consequently, theirapplication under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. is hereby allowed.It is directed that in the event of arrest, present applicant Nos. 1 to 3namely Smt. Priyanka Navtani, Smt. Savita and RajkumarVadhvani shall be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond in thesum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) each with asolvent surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of theArresting Police Officer.
The applicants shall make themselves available for interrogation by apolice officer as and when required. They shall further abide by theother conditions enumerated in sub-Section (2) of Section 438 of Cr.P.C.
Certified copy as per rules.