Sikkim High Court

WP(C)/34/2019 of Sikkim Manipal University Vs Union of India and Ors. on 11 April 2023

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF SIKKIM : GANGTOK (Civil Extraordinary Jurisdiction) DATED : 11th April, 2023 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SINGLE BENCH : THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI, JUDGE

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

THE HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM : GANGTOK(Civil Extraordinary Jurisdiction)

DATED : 11[th] April, 2023

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SINGLE BENCH : THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI, JUDGE

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WP(C) No.34 of 2019

Petitioner :Sikkim Manipal University

versus

Respondents :Union of India and Others

Application under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance Mr. Nikhil Nayyar, Senior Advocate with Mr. T. R. Barfungpa, Mr. Aman Ahluwalia and Mr. Hem Lall Manger, Advocates for the Petitioner.

Mr. Karma Thinlay, Central Government Counsel for the Respondent No.1.

Mr. A. Mariarputham, Senior Advocate with Mr. Thinlay Dorjee Bhutia, Advocate for the Respondent No.2.

Mr. S. K. Chettri, Government Advocate for the Respondent No.3.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- O R D E R (O R A L)

Meenakshi Madan Rai, J.

Heard Learned Senior Counsel for the Petitioner-University, who submits that the prayer in this Petition inter alia was for issuance for an appropriate writ, order or direction, quashing the letter of Respondent No.2, dated 15-11-2019, bearing F.No.81-3/2017 (DEB-IV), vide which the recognition granted to the Petitioner-University to admit students in the distance mode, for the academic year 2019-20 was withdrawn and to restore the approval earlier granted on 27-06-2019.

That, in view of the passage of time the Petition may be disposed of, however the issue arising on account of Annexure P-28, at Page No.211 of this Petition, be left open for decision on merits.

ds/sdl

The Respondents have no opposing submissions to make.

Considered.

In light of the foregoing submissions, Writ Petition stands disposed of, however the issue arising in Annexure P-28 is left open for decision on merits.

( Meenakshi Madan Rai ) Judge

11-04-2023

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead