Sikkim High Court
WP(C)/19/2020 of M/S Kamala Indane and ors Vs Union Of India And Ors. on 5 July 2022
COURT OF SIKKIM : GANGTOK Record of Proceedings Page 1 of 2 WP (PIL). No. 06/2017 PREM GOYAL PETITIONER (S) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. RESPONDENTS (S) For Petitioner : Mr. Bhusan Nepal, Amicus Curiae. For Respondent no.1 : Mr. Karma Thinlay, Central Govt. Counsel. For Respondents no. :
WP (PIL). No. 06/2017
PREM GOYAL
PETITIONER (S)
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
RESPONDENTS (S)
For Petitioner : For Respondent no.1 : For Respondents no. : 2 & 3 For Respondents no. : 4 to 7 For Respondents no. : 8 & 9 For Respondents no. : 10 to 17, 19 & 20 For Respondent no.18 : For Respondents no. : 21 to 23
Mr. Bhusan Nepal, Amicus Curiae.
Mr. Karma Thinlay, Central Govt. Counsel.
Mr. S.K. Chettri, Govt. Advocate.
Mr. Rahul Rathi, Advocate.
Ms. Tamanna Chettri, Advocate.
Mr. Ranjit Prasad, Advocate.
Ms. Manita Pradhan, Advocate.
Mr. Simeon Subba, Advocate.
WITH
WP (C) No. 19/2020
M/S KAMALA INDANE & ORS.
PETITIONER (S)
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
RESPONDENTS (S)
For Petitioners :
Mr. Ranjit Prasad, Advocate.
For Respondent no.1 : For Respondents no. : 2 to 4 For Respondents no. : 5 & 6 For Respondent no.7 :
Mr. Karma Thinlay, Central Govt. Counsel.
Mr. S.K. Chettri, Government Advocate.
Mr. Rahul Rathi, Advocate.
In-person.
Date: 05/07/2022
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BISWANATH SOMADDER, CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI, JUDGE
…
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
When the matter is taken up for consideration, the Registry draws our attention to a letter dated 17[th] June, 2022, written by the Deputy Secretary, Sikkim State Legal Services Authority, Gangtok, addressed to the Assistant Registrar, High Court of Sikkim, Gangtok, wherefrom it appears that the instant case was amicably settled at the Mediation Centre, East, at Gangtok, by Shri Narendra Rai, Senior Advocate/Mediator, East Sikkim at Gangtok. A deed of compromise signed by all the parties has also been annexed to the said letter dated 17[th] June, 2022.
Considering the fact that the matter has been amicably settled, we direct the Registry to forward copies of all relevant documents (including the deed of compromise) to Union of India, through the Secretary, Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, Government of India, New Delhi and also, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, having its registered office at Mumbai, so that necessary orders/directions can be issued by the concerned authority/authorities based on the compromise arrived at by and between the parties before the learned Mediator.
Since both the writ petitions have been pending for a considerable period of time, we expect the concerned authority/authorities to take steps in terms of this order, as expeditiously as possible.
Both writ petitions being W.P. (PIL) No. 06 of 2017 (Prem Goyal Vs Union of India and Ors.) and W.P. (C) No. 19 of 2020 (M/S Kamala Indane and Ors. Vs Union of India and Ors.), stand accordingly disposed of.
(Meenakshi Madan Rai)
(Biswanath Somadder) Chief Justice
Judge