Sikkim High Court
WP(C)/20/2013 of Shri Rajendra Chettri & Another Vs State Of Sikkim and Ors. on 14 August 2014
COURT OF SIKKIM CIVIL JURISDICTION W.P.(C) No. 20/2013 Rajendra Chhetri & Ano. vs. State of Sikkim & Ors. BEFORE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N.K. JAIN 08. 14.08.14 Present: M/s. (Dr.) Doma T. Bhutia and Sarita Bhusal, Advocates for the Petitioners. M/s. J.B. Pradhan,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM
CIVIL JURISDICTION
W.P.(C) No. 20/2013
Rajendra Chhetri & Ano. vs. State of Sikkim & Ors.
BEFORE
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N.K. JAIN
08. 14.08.14 Present:
M/s. (Dr.) Doma T. Bhutia and Sarita Bhusal, Advocates for the Petitioners.
M/s. J.B. Pradhan, Addl. Advocate General with S.K. Chettri and Pollin Rai, Asstt. Govt. Advocates for State-respondents No. 1 to 4.
Mr. J.K. Kharka, Advocate for respondent No. 5.
Ms. Sangita Pradhan, Advocate, Legal Retainer, DOP, for respondents No. 2 and 3.
Mr. D.K. Siwakoti, Advocate for respondent No. 6.
M/s Yangchen D. Gyatso, Tshering Palmoo Bhutia and Sonam Chuden Bhutia, Advocates for respondents No. 7 to 9.
Mr. Jorgay Namka, Advocate (Legal Aid Counsel) for respondent No. 10.
Mr. Tarden Lepcha and Pema Ongchu Bhutia, Advocates for respondent No. 11.
…
In view of order passed in CMA No. 238/2014, the Notification dated 09.08.2014 is taken on record.
Learned counsel for petitioners, Dr. Doma T. Bhutia, submitted that in view of Notification dated 09.08.2014 issued by respondent-State, she may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition.
Learned Addl. Advocate General has no objection in it. However, learned counsel appearing on behalf of private-respondents submitted that a liberty be granted to them to challenge the said Notification, in accordance with law.
After considering submissions of learned counsel for the parties, I allow this writ petition to be withdrawn and the same is hereby dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to private respondents, as prayed for.
Chief Justice 14.08.2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM CIVIL JURISDICTION
CMA No. 238/2014 in W.P.(C) No. 20/2013 Rajendra Chhetri & Ano. vs. State of Sikkim & Ors.
BEFORE
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N.K. JAIN
01. 14.08.14 Present:
M/s. (Dr.) Doma T. Bhutia and Sarita Bhusal, Advocates for the Petitioners.
M/s. J.B. Pradhan, Addl. Advocate General with S.K. Chettri and Pollin Rai, Asstt. Govt. Advocates for State-respondents No. 1 to 4.
Mr. J.K. Kharka, Advocate for respondent No. 5.
Ms. Sangita Pradhan, Advocate, Legal Retainer, DOP, for respondents No. 2 and 3.
Mr. D.K. Siwakoti, Advocate for respondent No. 6.
M/s Yangchen D. Gyatso, Tshering Palmoo Bhutia and Sonam Chuden Bhutia, Advocates for respondents No. 7 to 9.
Mr. Jorgay Namka, Advocate (Legal Aid Counsel) for respondent No. 10.
Mr. Tarden Lepcha and Pema Ongchu Bhutia, Advocates for respondent No. 11.
…
Respondent No. 3 has filed this Application to place on record a copy of notification dated 09.08.2014. After considering submission of learned counsel for the parties, I am inclined to allow this Application and the same is hereby allowed. Notification dated 09.08.2014 be taken on record.
A copy of this order may be placed on record in the file of W.P.(C) No. 20/2013.
Chief Justice 14.08.2014