Sikkim High Court
CRL.L.P/8/2024 of State of Sikkim Vs Avinash Chettri on 28 May 2025
Court No.2 High Court of Sikkim Record of proceedings CRL.L.P No.08 of 2024 State of Sikkim Petitioner VERSUS Avinash Chettri Respondent Date : 28-05-2025 CORAM : THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI, JUDGE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BHASKAR RAJ PRADHAN, JUDGE For Petitioner Mr.
Virtual Court No.2
High Court of Sikkim
CRL.L.P No.08 of 2024
State of Sikkim
Petitioner
VERSUS
Avinash Chettri
Respondent
Date: 28-05-2025
CORAM : THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI, JUDGE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BHASKAR RAJ PRADHAN, JUDGE
For Petitioner
Mr. S. K. Chettri, Additional Public Prosecutor.
For Respondent
Ms. Mingma Lhamu Sherpa, Advocate (Legal Aid Counsel).
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Rai, J.
Heard Learned Additional Public Prosecutor. He submits that leave be granted to file the Appeal as the Learned Trial Court failed to appreciate that, the victim was a minor despite the ossification test having been exhibited and corroborated by Prosecution witnesses. The evidence of the victim, who was a sterling witness, was not taken into consideration and the Respondent was acquitted erroneously, although the evidence of the victim was duly corroborated by the evidence of PWs 2, 3, 4 and 5. The Court also failed to examine the provisions of Section 29 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, resulting in prejudice to the Petitioner.
Learned Counsel for the Respondent objected to the Petition, urging that there are no errors in the findings of the Learned Trial Court.
Having heard in extenso and considered the submissions advanced, we are of the considered view that the Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has made out a prima facie case and raised arguable points upon which leave ought to be granted to file the Appeal.
Accordingly, leave to Appeal is allowed.
Register the Criminal Appeal.
Heard on admission.
Admit the Appeal.
Call for the records from the Learned Trial Court. Let Paper-Books be prepared.
List on 17-09-2025.
ds/bp/sdl
Judge Judge
28-05-2025 28-05-2025