Sikkim High Court
WP(C)/39/2025 of M/s. Indchemie Health Specialities Vs Union of India and Ors. on 30 July 2025
COURT OF SIKKIM Record of Proceedings WP(C) No.39 of 2025 M/S INDCHEMIE HEALTH SPECIALITIES PETITIONER VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS RESPONDENTS Date: 30.07.2025 CORAM : THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI, JUDGE For Petitioner For Respondents Mr. Arun Siwach, Advocate. Mr.
Record of Proceedings
WP(C) No.39 of 2025
M/S INDCHEMIE HEALTH SPECIALITIES
PETITIONER
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
RESPONDENTS
Date: 30.07.2025 CORAM :
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI, JUDGE
For Petitioner Mr. Arun Siwach, Advocate. Mr. Sujan Sunwar, Advocate.
For Respondents
Ms. Sangita Pradhan, Deputy Solicitor General of India.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
I.A. No.01 of 2025 is an application filed on behalf of Respondent no.4 seeking to place on record the subsequent developments in the present Writ Petition i.e., a copy of the Office Memorandum dated 10-07-2025, Clarification by the CBIC dated 18-07-2025 and Letter dated 22-07-2025, vide which the Assistant Commissioner, Gangtok, Division, Siliguri Central Goods and Service Tax, has ordered as follows; “ORDER
I hereby order to drop the Demand Note issued under No.04/Demand Note/Budgetary Support/Indchemie/Gtk-Div/2025-26 dated:20/06/2025 to M/s Indchemie Health Specialities Private Limited [GSTIN – 11AAACI1070P1ZS], in terms of the DPIIT Office Memorandum issued under No. P-66023/3/2025-GSTSS dated 10/07/2025 and the CBIC clarification issued under Letter No. CBIC-110267/107/2023-CX. VIII SECTION-CBEC dated 18/07/2025. ……………………………………………………………………….”
In view of the said circumstances, both parties submit that the matter is rendered infructuous and may be disposed of accordingly.
Having considered the submissions of Learned Counsel for the opposing parties and perused the Order, the Writ Petition stands disposed of as infructuous.
Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
Judge30.07.2025
ds/sdl