Sikkim High Court
WP(PIL)/8/2013 of New Sikkim Educational Society Vs Union Of India And Ors. on 5 June 2014
COURT OF SIKKIM CIVIL JURISDICTION CMA No. 183/2014 in W.P.(PIL) No. 08/2013 New Sikkim Educational Society vs. Union of India & Ors. BEFORE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N.K. JAIN HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. P. WANGDI, JUDGE 01. 02.07.14 Present: (Jain, CJ) Mr. Karma Thinlay,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM CIVIL JURISDICTION
CMA No. 183/2014 in W.P.(PIL) No. 08/2013
New Sikkim Educational Society vs. Union of India & Ors.
BEFORE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N.K. JAIN HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. P. WANGDI, JUDGE
01. 02.07.14 Present:
(Jain, CJ)
Mr. Karma Thinlay, Central Govt. Advocate for respondents No. 1, 2 and 22.
M/s. J.B. Pradhan, Addl. Advocate General with S.K. Chettri and Pollin Rai, Asstt. Govt. Advocates, for State-respondents No. 3 to 5.
Mr. Thinlay Dorjee Bhutia, Advocate for respondent No. 11.
M/s. A.K. Upadhyaya, Sr. Advocate with Binita Chhetri, Advocate for respondents No. 12 and 14.
…
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Mr. Thinlay Dorjee Bhutia, learned counsel submitted that he filed his Vakalatnama in this case on behalf of respondent No. 11 and he was present on 15[th], 16[th], 17[th], 23[rd] of April and 05[th] June, 2014 in the case on behalf of respondent No. 11, but after obtaining certified copy of order sheets he came to know that his presence has not been recorded on these dates. He further submitted that although there is a practice of this Court that a slip is required to be given containing names of the Advocates representing the parties to the Senior Reader, but he could not give the required slip on these dates. He feels sorry for it.
Mr. J.B. Pradhan, learned Addl. Advocate General and Mr. Karma Thinlay, learned Central Govt. Counsel submitted that Mr. Thinlay Dorjee Bhutia, learned counsel was present on these dates on behalf of respondent No. 11, when the case was called for hearing in the Court.
In view of statements of learned counsel, we direct that name of Mr. Thinlay Dorjee Bhutia, learned counsel be read on behalf of respondents No. 11 in the order sheets dated 15[th], 16[th], 17[th], 23[rd] of April and 05[th] June, 2014 and he be treated as present in the case on these dates.
The Application stands allowed.
Judge Chief Justice 02.07.2014 02.07.2014