Sikkim High Court
WP(C)/28/2014 of Ms Kmc Brahmputra Infrastructure Vs Union Of India And Ors. on 29 September 2014
HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM CIVIL JURISDICTION WP(C) No.28/2014 M/S KMC Brahmaputra Infrastructure vs. U.O.I. & Ors. BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. K. SINHA, JUDGE 04. 29.09.2014 Present : Mr. Jayesh Gaurav, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. Karma Thinlay Namgyal, Central Government Advocate for
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM
CIVIL JURISDICTION
WP(C) No.28/2014
M/S KMC Brahmaputra Infrastructure vs. U.O.I. & Ors.
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. K. SINHA, JUDGE
04. 29.09.2014 Present :
Mr. Jayesh Gaurav, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. Karma Thinlay Namgyal, Central Government Advocate for Respondent No.1.
Mr. J. B. Pradhan, Additional Advocate General with Mr. S. K. Chettri and Mrs. Pollin Rai, Assistant Government Advocates for the State/ Respondents/No.2 and 3.
Heard.
----
Mr. Jayesh Gaurav, learned Counsel for the petitioner, submits that the impugned order dated 03.02.2014 has already been withdrawn by a subsequent order dated 27.09.2014, therefore, the Writ Petition now has become infructuous.
In view of the above facts, when the impugned order dated 03.02.2014 has already been withdrawn, nothing survives for adjudication.
The Writ Petition, therefore is dismissed having become infructuous.
Judge
29-09-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM
CIVIL JURISDICTION
C.M.A. No.307/2014 in W.P.(C) No.28/2014
M/S KMC Brahmaputra Infrastructure vs. U.O.I. & Ors.
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. K. SINHA, JUDGE
01. 29.09.2014 Present : Mr. Jayesh Gaurav, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. Karma Thinlay Namgyal, Central Government Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr. J. B. Pradhan, Additional Advocate General with Mr. S. K. Chettri and Mrs. Pollin Rai, Assistant Government Advocates for the State/ Respondents/No.2 and 3. ---- This is an application filed by the Respondents 2 and 3 for taking order dated 27.09.2014 on record.
Not opposed.
The said order is taken on record.
C.M.Appl. No.307/2014 stands disposed of.
Judge
29-09-2014
Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No
At