Sikkim High Court
WP(C)/24/2022 of Shyamal Pal Vs The Secretary, Land Revenue Department and ors.and ors. on 2 August 2022
COURT OF SIKKIM Record of proceedings W.P.(C) No.24 of 2022 SHYAMAL PAL ……. PETITIONER VERSUS THE SECRETARY, LAND REVENUE DEPARTMENT AND ORS. ……. RESPONDENTS Date: 02.08.2022 CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BHASKAR RAJ PRADHAN, J. For Petitioner : Mr. Jigme
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM Record of proceedings W.P.(C) No.24 of 2022
SHYAMAL PAL ……. PETITIONER
VERSUS
THE SECRETARY, LAND REVENUE DEPARTMENT AND ORS. ……. RESPONDENTS
Date: 02.08.2022
CORAM :
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BHASKAR RAJ PRADHAN, J.
For Petitioner : Mr. Jigme Phunchok Bhutia, Advocate. For Respondent : Dr. Doma T. Bhutia, Additional Advocate Nos. 1 to 3. General. Mr. S.K. Chettri, Government Advocate. Mr. Shakil Raj Karki, Assistant Government Advocate. For Respondent : Mr. Jorgay Namka, Advocate. No.4. Ms. Adeshna Subba, Advocate.
......
The learned Additional Advocate General appears after notice representing State-respondents. Mr. Jorgay Namka, learned counsel appears for respondent no.4. At the outset the learned Additional Advocate General submits that by letter dated 26.07.2022 addressed to the respondent no.4, the impugned letter dated 08.09.2021 passed by the respondent no.3 has been withdrawn and as such nothing survives in the present writ petition which had sought for quashing of the impugned letter. Mr. Jigme Phunchok, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that in view of the letter dated 26.07.2022 the writ petition has become infructuous. In view of the same, the letter bearing memo No. 504/DC(GTK)/2022 dated 26.07.2022 issued by the respondent no.3 is taken on record and marked X. The writ petition is disposed as infructuous.
Judge