Sikkim High Court

WP(C)/41/2019 of Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited Vs The Union of India and Ors. on 10 December 2020

Court No.2 High Court of Sikkim Record of proceedings Page | 1 WP(C) No.41 of 2019 Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited Petitioner VERSUS The Union of India and Others Respondents Date : 10-12-2020 CORAM : THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI, JUDGE For Petitioner Mr. Ashish Verma,

Virtual Court No.2

WP(C) No.41 of 2019

Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited

Petitioner

VERSUS

The Union of India and Others

Respondents

Date : 10-12-2020

CORAM : THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI, JUDGE

For Petitioner Mr. Ashish Verma, Advocate.

Mr. Manish Kr. Jain, Advocate.

For Respondents R-1 to R-3

Mr. Karma Thinlay, Central Government Advocate.

Digitally signed by MEENAKSHI MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI MADAN RAIDate: 2020.12.10 15:50:47 +05'30'

O R D E R

Page 1 of 2

Heard Learned Counsel for the opposing parties at length. It was submitted by Learned Counsel for the Petitioner that the Petitioner herein impugns Notification S.O.No.1731(E) dated 10-07-2014. That, the issues involved in the instant Writ Petition are in pith and substance similar to the issues involved in WP(C) No.06 of 2018. That, in the said Writ Petition, this High Court after hearing Learned Counsel for the parties had inter alia ordered that the Petitioner shall approach the Respondent No.3 within a period of two weeks from the day of the said order. That, Respondent No.3, in turn, shall in compliance with the principles of natural justice, hear the Petitioner on all the grievances it seeks to make before the Respondent No.3 and thereafter the Respondent No.3 shall come to an independent conclusion uninfluenced by the earlier Demand Notice and pass a reasoned order. The Writ Petition was disposed of with the said directions.

That, considering the facts and circumstances, as put forth above, a similar direction be issued in the instant matter.

I have given due consideration to the submissions of Learned Counsel for the parties and in view of the fact that the issues raised in the instant Writ Petition are similar to those raised in WP(C) No.06 of 2018, it is ordered that the Petitioner Virtual Court No.2

Record of proceedings

shall approach the Respondent No.3 who shall after hearing the Petitioner take appropriate steps with a reasoned order. Writ Petition stands disposed of accordingly.

MEENAKSHI Digitally signed by MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI MADAN RAIDate: 2020.12.10 15:51:15 +05'30'

Judge

10-12-2020

ds

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead