Sikkim High Court
WP(PIL)/47/2012 of Tenchung Lachungpa, Pipon And Public Of Lachung Dzomsa Vs Chief Secretary, Govt. of Sikkim and Ors. on 25 July 2014
COURT OF SIKKIM CIVIL JURISDICTION W.P.(PIL) No. 47/2012 Tenchung Lachungpa, Pipon and Public of Lachung Dzomsa vs. Chief Secretary, Govt. of Sikkim & Ors. BEFORE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N.K. JAIN HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. K. SINHA, JUDGE 18. 25.07.14 Present: Mr.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM
CIVIL JURISDICTION
W.P.(PIL) No. 47/2012
Tenchung Lachungpa, Pipon and Public of Lachung Dzomsa vs. Chief Secretary, Govt. of Sikkim & Ors.
BEFORE
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N.K. JAIN
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. K. SINHA, JUDGE
18. 25.07.14 Present:
(Jain, CJ)
Mr. Zangpo Sherpa, Advocate as ‘Amicus Curiae’ for the petitioners.
M/s. J.B. Pradhan, Addl. Advocate General with S.K. Chettri and Pollin Rai, Asstt. Govt. Advocates for State-respondents No. 1 to 4.
Mr. Karma Thinlay, Central Govt. Advocate for respondents No. 5 to 7.
…
Learned counsel for both the parties agreed that the points/issues involved in the present writ petition are also the subject matter of W.P.(PIL) No. 45/2012 and a similar writ petition i.e. W.P.(PIL) No. 24/2014 was disposed off yesterday by this Court. Therefore, by passing the same order this writ petition can be disposed off.
The order dated 24.+++++07.2014 passed in W.P.(PIL) No. 24/2014 reads as under: - “Mr. Karma Thinlay, learned Central Govt. Counsel submitted that there is no need to file any counter affidavit in the present matter, as all the points/ issues involved in the present writ petition are also subject matter of W.P.(PIL) No. 45/2012. Therefore, this writ petition can be disposed off and all points involved in the present writ petition may be considered in the W.P.(PIL) No. 45/2012.
We have examined both the writ petitions and we find substance in the statement of learned Central Govt. Counsel. In these circumstances, we dispose of the present writ petition with the observations and clear understanding that all issues/points involved in this writ petition will be considered and decided in W.P.(PIL) No. 45/2012.
A copy of this order be placed on record in the file of W.P.(PIL) No. 45/2012.”
As agreed and submitted by learned counsel for parties, the present writ petition stands disposed off, for the same reasons, liberty and observation in the order dated 24.07.2014 passed in W.P. (PIL) No. 24/2014.
Judge 25.07.2014
Chief Justice 25.07.2014