Sikkim High Court
CO/1/2023 of UDHAY KUMAR PRADHAN Vs Ms. AVIPSA PATHAK AND ORS. on 26 March 2024
COURT OF SIKKIM Record of Proceedings MAC App. No.03 of 2023 The Branch Manager, National Insurance Company Limited Appellant versus Avipsa Pathak And Others Respondents For Appellant Mr. Thupden G. Bhutia, Advocate. For Respondents R-1 to R-3 R-4 R-5 Mr. Sishir Mothay, Advocate. Mr. Sushant
HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM
Record of Proceedings
MAC App. No.03 of 2023
The Branch Manager, National Insurance Company Limited Appellant
versus
Avipsa Pathak And Others
Respondents
For Appellant Mr. Thupden G. Bhutia, Advocate.
For Respondents R-1 to R-3 Mr. Sishir Mothay, Advocate.
R-4 Mr. Sushant Subba, Advocate.
R-5 Mr. Romit Gurung, Advocate.
with
CO No.01 of 2023 in MAC App. No.03 of 2023
Udhay Kumar Pradhan
versus
Avipsa Pathak And Others
Petitioner
Respondents
For Petitioner Mr. Sushant Subba, Advocate.
For Respondents
R-1 to R-3 Mr. Sishir Mothay, Advocate.
R-4 Mr. Romit Gurung, Advocate.
R-5 Mr. Thupden G. Bhutia, Advocate.
Date : 25-04-2024
CORAM:THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI, JUDGE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Typographical errors are noticed in MAC App. No.03 of 2023 with CO No.01 of 2023, dated 26-03-2024, which are read out in the presence of Learned Counsel for both parties in the Court to enable this Court to rectify the typographical errors, duly invoking the provisions of Section 152 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. At page 5, Paragraph 9 of the said Judgment (supra) reads as follows; “9. The question for consideration is “Whether the compensation of computation arrived at by the Learned Claims Tribunal was correct?”
The following is the rectification to be made in the said sentence; “9. The question for consideration is “Whether thecomputation of compensation arrived at by the Learned Claims Tribunal was correct?”
The aforesaid corrections shall be incorporated in the Judgment, consequent upon which copies be made available to the parties and uploaded in the website.
Judge25-04-2024
ds