Sikkim High Court
WP(C)/32/2019 of Mumtaz Rai Vs State Trading Corporation of Sikkim (STCS) and Ors. on 12 June 2020
No. 3. HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM Record of Proceedings through Video Conferencing WP(C) No. 32 of 2019 MUMTAZ RAI PETITIONER VERSUS STATE TRADING CORPORATION OF SIKKIM (STCS) AND ORS. RESPONDENT(S) Date: 12/06/2020 CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BHASKAR RAJ PRADHAN, J. For Petitioner : Mr.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
Court Room No. 3.
WP(C) No. 32 of 2019
MUMTAZ RAI
PETITIONER
VERSUS
STATE TRADING CORPORATION OF SIKKIM (STCS) AND ORS.
RESPONDENT(S)
Date: 12/06/2020
CORAM :
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BHASKAR RAJ PRADHAN, J.
…
Heard Mr. Ateendra Raj Bagdas, learned counsel for the petitioner, Dr. Doma T. Bhutia, learned Additional Advocate General along with Mr. S.K. Chettri, Government Advocate for the State respondent nos.1 and 2 and Mr. Sujan Sunwar, Assistant Government Advocate for the respondent no.3.
Mr. Bagdas submits that the petitioner’s extended term is over, she is no longer in service and as such, the writ petition has become infructuous. He seeks to withdraw the same.
The learned counsel for the State respondents have no objection.
The writ petitioner is permitted to withdraw the writ petition.
Court Room No. 3.
HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM Record of Proceedings through Video Conferencing The writ petition stands disposed as withdrawn.
Judge
Index : Yes/ No Internet : Yes / No