Sikkim High Court

CRP/4/2008 of Chandra Kala Chettri Vs Hemlata Chettri on 18 December 2008

Orders witti signature Office Note as to action (I/ ¢„J,) taken on order Present : Mr. U. P. Sharma, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. N. Rai with Ms. Jyoti Kharka, Advocates for the Respondent. Heard the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. At the very outset, the

07.18.12.2008

Orders witti signature

Present : Mr. U. P. Sharma, Advocatefor the Petitioner.

Mr. N. Rai with Ms. JyotiKharka, Advocates for theRespondent.

Heard the learned Counselappearing on behalf of the parties.

At the very outset, the learnedCounsel for the Petitioner submittedthat on a reconsideration of thematter, he has decided to withdrawthis petition and to file a fresh petitionunder Articles 226 and 227 of theConstitution.

An application filed forpermission to withdraw this petitionand to file a fresh one is not opposedby the learned Counsel for theRespondent, However, as prayed for,the Petitioner is allowed to withdrawthis petition. Needless to say, it shallbe open to the Petitioner to file a freshapplication under the relevantprovisions of law, if so advised.

This petition accordingly standsd,sposedofas:':hudst:kei Actina Chiof Justice Office Note as toaction (I/ ¢„J,)taken on order ]J &ul, fundbeI- hcalL OL.'i"_,f#

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead