Sikkim High Court
WP(C)/12/2018 of Arun Chettri Vs State of Sikkim and Others on 14 October 2020
Court No.2 High Court of Sikkim Record of proceedings Page | 1 WP(C) No.12 of 2018 Arun Chettri Petitioner VERSUS State of Sikkim and Others Respondents Date : 14-10-2020 CORAM : THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI, JUDGE For Petitioner Mr. Tashi Norbu Basi, Advocate. For
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Virtual Court No.2
High Court of Sikkim
Arun Chettri
WP(C) No.12 of 2018
Petitioner
VERSUS
State of Sikkim and Others
Respondents
Date :14-10-2020
CORAM : THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI, JUDGE
For Petitioner Mr. Tashi Norbu Basi, Advocate.
For Respondents R-1, R-2, R-4 & R-5 Ms. Yeshi Wangmoo Rinchen, Government Advocate.
R-3 Mr. J. B. Pradhan, Senior Advocate. Mr. Bhusan Nepal, Advocate. R-6 Mr. N. Rai, Senior Advocate. Ms. Susmita Gurung, Advocate.
O R DE R
Heard on I.A. No.06 of 2020 which is an application filed by the Petitioner submitting that the Petitioner had in the instant Petition challenged the appointment of Respondent No.6 to the post of Under Secretary against one seat reserved for OBC (State List) category on the ground that the Respondent No.6 fell under creamy layer of the said reserved category on account of the employment status of his mother.
In the interregnum, the Respondent No.3 conducted an MEENAKSHI Digitally signed by MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI examination for the post of Assistant Engineer (Civil) in 2018 MADAN RAIDate: 2020.10.14 18:50:51 +05'30'wherein the Respondent No.6 got selected and tendered his resignation from the post of Under Secretary.
That, in this circumstance, the Petitioner does not seek to pursue the instant Writ Petition and seeks permission to withdraw it.
Not opposed.
Virtual Court No.2
ds
Considered.
In the aforementioned circumstances, I.A. No.06 of 2020 is allowed and the Writ Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.
MEENAKSHI Digitally signed by MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI MADAN RAIDate: 2020.10.14 18:51:24 +05'30'
Judge
14-10-2020