Sikkim High Court
WP(C)/52/2017 of Renuka Sharma Vs State of Sikkim and Others on 26 July 2018
COURT OF SIKKIM Record of Proceedings WP(C) No.52 of 2017 RENUKA SHARMA PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF SIKKIM AND ORS. RESPONDENT(S) Date: 26.07.2018 CORAM : THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI, A.C.J. For Petitioner(s) : Mr. A . Moulik, Sr. Advocate with Mrs. K.D. Bhutia, Mr.
HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM Record of Proceedings WP(C) No.52 of 2017
RENUKA SHARMA
PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
STATE OF SIKKIM AND ORS.
RESPONDENT(S)
Date: 26.07.2018
CORAM :
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI, A.C.J.
For Petitioner(s) :
Mr. A. Moulik, Sr. Advocate with Mrs. K.D. Bhutia, Mr. Ranjit Prasad and Ms Archana Sharma, Advocates. Mrs. K.D. Bhutia, Mr. Ranjit Prasad and Ms Archana Sharma, Advocates.
with
For Respondent(s)
For R-1 & R-2 :
Mr. Karma Thinlay, Sr. Govt. Advocate with Mr. Thinlay Dorjee, Govt. Advocate, Mr. S.K. Chettri and Mrs. Pollin Rai, Asst. Govt. Advocates. with Mr. Thinlay Dorjee, Govt. Advocate, Mr. S.K. Chettri and Mrs. Pollin Rai, Asst. Govt. Advocates.
For R-3 :
Mr. Jorgay Namka, Panila Theengh, Ms Tashi Doma Sherpa and Mr. Karma S. Lhendup, Advocates. … Tashi Doma Sherpa and Mr. Karma S. Lhendup, Advocates. …
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
It is submitted by learned Counsel for the Petitioner that the Petitioner does not seek to pursue this matter due to an intervening advantageous situation and seeks to withdraw the Petition.
Not opposed.
Considered.
Writ Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.
Acting Chief Justice
26.07.2018
Index : Yes/ No Internet : Yes / NoJk/bp