Sikkim High Court
C.M.C/5/2021 of CENTRAL REFERRAL HOSPITAL, MANIPAL Vs MANI KUMAR SUBBA AND OTHERS on 8 October 2021
HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM Record of Proceedings C. M.C. No.05 of 2021 CENTRAL REFERRAL HOSPITAL, PETITIONER MANIPAL VERSUS MANI KUMAR SUBBA & ORS. RESPONDENTS Date: 08.10.2021 CORAM: THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI, A.C.J. THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BHASKAR RAJ PRADHAN,
C. M.C. No.05 of 2021
CENTRAL REFERRAL HOSPITAL, PETITIONER MANIPAL
VERSUS
MANI KUMAR SUBBA & ORS. RESPONDENTS
Date: 08.10.2021
CORAM:
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI, A.C.J. THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BHASKAR RAJ PRADHAN, JUDGE
For Petitioner Mr. T. R. Barfungpa, Advocate. Mr. Hemlal Manger, Advocate.
For Respondents R-1 Mr. Yam Kumar Subba, Advocate. R-2 to R-4 Mr. Sudesh Joshi, Additional Advocate General. Mr. Sujan Sunwar, Assistant Government Advocate.
R-5 to R-7 Ms. Sangita Pradhan, Assistant Solicitor General of India.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
The Petitioner herein, by filing the instant Petition, seeks correction of the typographical error which has occurred in the Order of this Court, dated 15.09.2021, in W.P. (PIL) No.08 of 2020, wherein at Paragraph 7, the price of RAT Testing for Covid 19 has been reflected as “Rs.300/-“ instead of “Rs.350/-.”
Considered.
The sum reflected as “Rs.300/-“ shall be read as “Rs.350/-“ in Paragraph 7 of the Order, dated 15.09.2021, in W.P. (PIL) No.08 of 2020.
C.M.C. No.05 of 2021 accordingly stands disposed of.
Judge 08.10.2021
Acting Chief Justice
08.10.2021