Sikkim High Court

WP(PIL)/6/2019 of In Re- Suspension of Flight Operations From Pakyong Airport Vs x on 26 October 2021

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Page 1 of 2 HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM Record of Proceedings through Video Conferencing WP (PIL) No. 06/2019 IN RE: SUSPENSION OF FLIGHT OPERATIONS FROM PAKYONG AIRPORT For Petitioner : Mr. Jorgay Namka, Amicus Curiae. For Respondents No.2 &: Mr. Vivek Kohli, Advocate General. 5 Ms. Y.W.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

HIGH COURT OF SIKKIMRecord of Proceedings through Video Conferencing WP (PIL) No. 06/2019

IN RE: SUSPENSION OF FLIGHT OPERATIONS FROM PAKYONG AIRPORT

For Petitioner : Mr. Jorgay Namka, Amicus Curiae. For Respondents No.2 &: Mr. Vivek Kohli, Advocate General. 5 Ms. Y.W. Rinchen, Government Advocate. For Respondents No.3 &: Mr. Manish Kumar Jain, Advocate. 4 For Respondent No.6 : Mr. Abhinav Sharma, Advocate. For Respondents No.1 &: None. 7

Date: 26/10/2021

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BISWANATH SOMADDER, CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI, JUDGE

…

JUDGMENT:(per the Hon’ble, the Chief Justice) (Oral)

Based on a news article titled “SpiceJet suspends Pakyong flights for four months”, which was published in an English daily newspaper, “Sikkim Express” on 2[nd] June, 2019, the instant suo motu Public Interest Litigation was registered. The first order which is on record, is an order dated 6[th]June, 2019, and thereafter, the matter has been heard from time to time for more than two years. Pleadings have been exchanged and reports have been filed by various authorities. As of now, we have been informed that flight operations have resumed at Pakyong Airport. Various reports and pleadings, however, clearly indicate that there are several issues which are required to be addressed by the stakeholders, especially, with regard to acquiring of land and setting up of proper and essential navigational equipments.

jk/avi

We do not intend to enlarge the scope of this suo motu Public Interest Litigation beyond the issue for which it was initiated, i.e., suspension of flight operations from Pakyong Airport. The reason is, flight operations have resumed from Pakyong Airport. We, however, dispose of this Public Interest Litigation with an observation that all stakeholders shall consider the issues which are involved, particularly, those which led to the suspension of flight operations from Pakyong Airport and address them on a priority basis so that the object of creation of Pakyong Airport is not frustrated due to those reasons.

This suo motu Public Interest Litigation stands, accordingly, disposed of.

(Meenakshi Madan Rai) Judge

(Biswanath Somadder) Chief Justice

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead